As delegates arrived in Brazzaville for the African Development Bank’s annual meetings, they were greeted not first by speeches or strategy papers, but by temperature checks, Ebola questionnaires, and a registration queue that moved with the kind of patience usually reserved for long-term infrastructure projects, setting the tone for a week in which the bank is again trying to answer a familiar question about whether Africa’s leading development finance institution is truly transforming how the continent is financed, or simply producing increasingly sophisticated ways of describing the same bottlenecks, as it sits between a $400bn annual financing gap, an estimated $4tn in domestic savings, and a growing expectation that it should somehow turn both into electricity, growth, and delivery timelines shorter than an airport badge collection process.
Has the African Development Bank spent the last decade reshaping Africa’s development finance system, or refining an agenda that still struggles to deliver at scale?
That question hangs over this year’s annual meetings in Brazzaville, where more than 3,000 delegates have gathered for the second day under tightened health precautions linked to an Ebola outbreak in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo, which has recorded more than 900 suspected cases. At the airport, officials in protective equipment have been conducting temperature checks and distributing health questionnaires, a reminder that even the logistics of development finance can be shaped by crises far from the conference hall.
The meeting is the first in Brazzaville since 1984 and the first under new African Development Bank president Sidi Ould Tah, who has taken office at a time when external financing conditions are tightening and African governments are under pressure to find new sources of capital.
At the centre of discussions is a structural gap in development finance that the bank estimates at around 400 billion dollars annually. At the same time, it argues that Africa holds approximately 4 trillion dollars in domestic savings, much of it in pension funds, insurance assets and sovereign wealth vehicles, but a significant share remains invested outside the continent or fragmented across national systems.
Sub-Saharan Africa’s savings rate stands at about 18 percent, less than half the global average according to World Bank data, highlighting the scale of the constraint facing policymakers even before questions of coordination and investment efficiency are considered.
The bank’s proposed response is a new framework called the New African Financial Architecture for Development, or NAFAD. It is intended to align domestic institutional capital with development priorities by improving coordination between pension funds, insurers, development banks and sovereign wealth funds, and by strengthening pipelines of investable infrastructure projects.
The AfDB argues that Africa could potentially mobilise up to 1.43 trillion dollars annually from domestic sources if financial systems were better integrated and capital leakages reduced. The aim is not to create a new institution but to coordinate existing ones more effectively.
President Sidi Ould Tah has made that argument central to his early tenure. “The current architecture of financing Africa’s development is inadequate and not fit for purpose,” Tah said last month. “The truth is that we do not suffer from a lack of capital: Africa has approximately $4 trillion in medium- and long-term savings.”
However, the challenge has long been less about identifying capital and more about deploying it at scale. Much of Africa’s institutional savings is governed by national rules that restrict cross-border investment, while currency risk, political risk and project preparation gaps continue to limit large scale deployment.
External conditions are adding further pressure. Foreign aid from wealthy countries fell by nearly 25 percent last year to 174.3 billion dollars, according to OECD data cited in development finance analysis, while borrowing costs remain high across much of the continent. In this environment, officials say Africa is being pushed towards greater financial self-reliance.
One of the most contentious issues at the meetings is the cost of borrowing and the role of international credit ratings agencies. African governments have repeatedly argued that agencies including Moody’s, S&P Global and Fitch Ratings overstate risk on the continent, increasing borrowing costs and limiting fiscal space for development spending.
“The African Development Bank is trying to see to what extent they also can support African countries when it comes to credit ratings,” said Daouda Sembene, president and chief executive of AfriCatalyst, adding that he expected possible announcements during the meetings.
Energy policy is another central theme. The bank’s Mission 300 initiative aims to connect 300 million Africans to electricity by 2030, a flagship programme seen as critical to industrialisation and job creation. Yet debates persist over what kind of energy systems should be prioritised.
“The 300 million target is serious and the ambition is right,” said Rajneesh Bhuee of Recourse, a non-profit organisation focused on climate and development finance. She said funding for decentralised renewable energy had fallen sharply in recent years even as demand in rural communities remains high.
At the same time, the bank continues to face scrutiny over fossil fuel financing. While it did not approve direct fossil fuel projects in 2024, it approved a 150 million dollar loan for the Coral North Floating Liquefied Natural Gas project in Mozambique earlier this year, reopening debate over the role of gas in Africa’s transition.
Even nuclear energy, long outside mainstream African development finance discussions, is increasingly part of the conversation. The World Bank has ended its long-standing ban on nuclear financing, and other development institutions have begun revising their positions, although no policy shift is expected from the AfDB at these meetings.
Underlying all of these discussions is a broader question about execution and institutional effectiveness. Under former president Akinwumi Adesina, the bank expanded its profile and pursued efforts to improve efficiency, but critics argue that project delivery across African development finance remains slow and fragmented.
Mr Tah has pledged to reduce project approval timelines from around 18 months to as little as three months, a reform that would significantly reshape how quickly the bank can respond to government requests if achieved in practice.
For supporters, the AfDB’s evolving agenda reflects a necessary shift from fragmented financing to coordinated capital mobilisation. For critics, it risks repeating a familiar pattern in development finance, where ambitious frameworks generate momentum but struggle to translate into delivery at the speed required.
Faustine Ngila is the AI Editor at Impact Newswire, based in Nairobi, Kenya. He is an award-winning journalist specializing in artificial intelligence, blockchain, and emerging technologies.
He previously worked as a global technology reporter at Quartz in New York and Digital Frontier in London, where he covered innovation, startups, and the global digital economy.
With years of experience reporting on cutting-edge technologies, Faustine focuses on AI developments, industry trends, and the impact of technology on society.
Yaa Gyasi
Biggest Selling Title: Homegoing
Short Bio: A Ghanaian-American novelist, Gyasi’s debut novel Homegoing traces the lineage of two half-sisters and their descendants, exploring the impact of slavery on generations.
infinite hole
Canada: You have two cows. But who cares about beef when you\’ve got Poutine.