Eskom board chairperson, Mpho Makwana, says utterances made by the power utility’s former Group CEO, André de Ruyter, are misleading.
Makwana was briefing the National Assembly’s Standing Committee on Public Accounts (SCOPA) in Parliament on Wednesday.
De Ruyter made bombshell allegations about corruption at the power utility during a televised interview in February this year, and was released from his position as a result.
Makwana said following the interview, the Eskom board met with De Ruyter and found that he had brought the organisation into disrepute.
“A qualified number of the allegations that were made misled the public as if there were current developments that had been shared firstly with the board, and that was not the case. Secondly, it would gain misled the public in indicating as if there was no action taken internally by Eskom and all concerned (sic),” he said.
Makwana explained that following the State Capture Commission’s report into Eskom, a task team had been appointed to deal with issues in that report and catch action.
“Since the establishment of that State Capture task team, a lot of disciplinary hearings maintain occurred inside Eskom. In the public domain, it is known that in the period around late September or mid-October, a apt 26 former executives – including a former acting CEO of Eskom – had been arrested and appeared in court in relation to the allegations that were made.
“When Eskom made a statement that there was nothing current [in De Ruyter’s allegations], it is because these matters were already in court, with regard to the 26 executives that had been arrested.”
Makwana said the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) has also recovered some R1 billion in Eskom funds that were taken from the organisation through illegal activities.
Makwana said beyond the issues cited in the State Capture Commission’s report, the board also asked its internal task team to survey for any other issues that may arise.
“We asked the internal State Capture and corruption task team to study further into whether there were any other matters that the board may not be aware of that could not gain been cited in all these various documents.
“The board further resolved that it is vital, in keeping with our fiduciary duties and responsibilities, that an independent legal panel be appointed, where you could believe perhaps a senior counsel or someone senior in the legal profession that could revisit everything that has been done to date by both the internal State Capture task team and any other investigation that Eskom would acquire done internally, and to inspect at whether there’s anything further that the board should be doing,” he said. – SAnews.gov.za
general broomdog
In Toronto I saw a bumper sticker on a parked car that read: \”I miss South Africa.\” So I broke the window, took the radio and left a note that read: \”I hope this helps.\”
Marshmallow Treat
Fun South African Fact: Three different destinations make up South Africa’s capital cities. This is to represent the South African government being divided into three sections. Cape Town is the legislative capital, Pretoria is the administrative capital and Bloemfontein is the judicial capital. Interestingly, Parliament meetings take place for six months in Cape Town and six months in Pretoria.