• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MyZA

MyZA

News, Directory, Events and Other Stuff

  • Social Media
  • Sport
  • World News
  • Home
  • Submit News
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Stratlec
  • TFSA
  • News
    • APO
    • Today’s Sport News
    • Todays Social Media and Tech Headlines
    • Today’s World News
    • Today’s SA Financial News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / Sport / Kumal And Eisakhil Guilty Of Breaching The ICC Code Of Conduct

Kumal And Eisakhil Guilty Of Breaching The ICC Code Of Conduct

2 February 2024 by Alan

Nepal’s Arjun Kumal and Afghanistan’s Hassan Eisakhil have been reprimanded for breaching the ICC Code of Conduct during their matches at the ICC U19 Men’s Cricket World Cup on 31 January.

In the Nepal v Bangladesh fixture, Kumal was found to have breached Article 2.12 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, which relates to “Inappropriate physical contact with a Player, Player Support Personnel, Umpire, Match Referee or any other person (including a spectator) during an International Match.”

Kumal’s conduct constitutes a Level 2 offence, resulting in one suspension point. In addition to this, three demerit points have been added to his disciplinary record, for whom it was the first offence in a 24-month period.

The incident occurred during the sixth over of Nepal’s innings, when Kumal ran into and elbowed Bangladesh bowler Maruf Mridha while completing a run between the wicket.

Kumal admitted the offence and accepted the sanction proposed by Graeme Labrooy of the Emirates International Panel of ICC Match Referees and, as such, there was no need for a formal hearing.

On-field umpires Rashid Riaz Waqar, Faisal Khan Afridi and TV umpire Allahudien Palekar levelled the charge.

Elsewhere, in the USA v Afghanistan fixture, Afghanistan opener Eisakhil was found to have breached Article 2.8 of the ICC Code of Conduct for Players and Player Support Personnel, relating to “Showing dissent at an Umpire’s decision during an International Match.”

As a result of this Level 1 offence, Eisakhil was reprimanded with one demerit point added to his disciplinary record. The offence was also his first in a 24-month period.

The incident occurred following his dismissal in the first over, when Eisakhil was given out caught behind. Eisakhil reacted by gesturing to the match official, walking down the wicket, dropping his bat in close proximity to the on-field umpire and excessively delaying leaving the field of play.

Eisakhil admitted the offence and accepted the sanction proposed by Wayne Noon of the Emirates International Panel of ICC Match Referees and, as such, there was no need for a formal hearing.

On-field umpires Bongani Jele, Patrick Gustard and TV umpire K.N. Ananthapadmanabhan levelled the charge.

Level 1 breaches carry a minimum penalty of an official reprimand, a maximum penalty of 50 per cent of a player’s match fee, and one or two demerit points. Level 2 breaches carry a maximum penalty of between 50 to 100 per cent of a player’s match fee, three or four demerit points and up to two suspension points.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Category: SportTag: Cricket

If you feel strongly about this article then feel free to send MyZA a ‘Letter to the Editor’ using the submission form below:


Letter to the Editor

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
If this is in response to an article please include that article title here or as the lead in for the first paragraph of your Letter below.

Separate tags with commas

Localise your letter by naming the city your words are about. Add relevant words describing your subject. Single comma separated words of no more than 5
Your Name(Required)
Your Name will be linked to the website below.
Your personal, business or social media web site
Choose NO to not set up a user account on MyZA. User Accounts will allow you to submit letters under your own Author Name

3 Latest Letters to the Editor:

  • Fun South African fact

    Dear Editor Fun South African fact: towns like Franschhoek and Stellenbosch are home to world-class wine farms set in stunning, scenic surroundings. Regards Aressa Smith In Response to/From: Luxury Properties Seized in New Lottery Crackdown

    27 January 2026
  • Condolences on the Passing of Lusanda Dumke

    Statement by Leander Kruger MPL – DA Buffalo City Constituency Leader: The Democratic Alliance in Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality mourns the passing of Springbok Women’s rugby player and Mdantsane trailblazer, Lusanda Dumke, who lost her battle with cancer at the age of 28. South Africa has lost an exceptional athlete, a leader, and a source…

    17 December 2025
  • Rape Kits Delivered, But…

    Statement by Nicholas Gotsell MP – DA NCOP Member on Security & Justice: The DA can confirm that 2 840 rape kits arrived in Cape Town on Monday, following sustained DA oversight and pressure after multiple police stations across the Western Cape were found to be without this critical forensic evidence tool. While this delivery…

    17 December 2025

About Alan

Previous Post:Be part of the biggest carnival of cricket to be held in the West Indies and USA from 1-29 June 2024
Next Post:Scotland Emerge Victorious Against Namibia

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. PepperBurst

    2 February 2024 at 8:58 am

    The name for the sport is believed to maintain originated from “criquet”, the Worn French term for stick, goal, or post. It may also believe near from “kricke”, a Middle Dutch term for stick or staff.

  2. Dr. WMD

    2 February 2024 at 8:57 am

    Sport Trivia: Which South African who played between 1949 and 1960 was named a Wisden Cricketer of the year in 1956? Answer: Hugh Tayfield. Hugh Tayfield once bowled 137 consecutive dot balls in a 1956/57 Test match against England which was held in Durban. Statistics for bowlers who believe played 20 or more tests display that Hugh Tayfield conceded only 1.64 runs per over during his test career.

Copyright © 2026 · MyZA · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Reach Trust