• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MyZA

MyZA

News, Directory, Events and Other Stuff

  • Social Media
  • Sport
  • World News
  • Home
  • Submit News
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Stratlec
  • TFSA
  • News
    • APO
    • Today’s Sport News
    • Todays Social Media and Tech Headlines
    • Today’s World News
    • Today’s SA Financial News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / SAFA provides update on expelled NEC members – South African Football Association

SAFA provides update on expelled NEC members – South African Football Association

2 August 2026 by Guest

2 August 2026 – The South African Football Association (SAFA) welcomes the order of the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg, handed down this week where the urgent application brought by the four expelled National Executive Committee members was struck from the roll for lack of urgency. The four were ordered to pay

The post SAFA provides update on expelled NEC members appeared first on South African Football Association.

2 August 2026 – The South African Football Association (SAFA) welcomes the order of the High Court of South Africa, Gauteng Division, Johannesburg, handed down this week where the urgent application brought by the four expelled National Executive Committee members was struck from the roll for lack of urgency. The four were ordered to pay SAFA’s legal costs.

This is the fourth occasion where the same dispute has been placed before an urgent court, and the second division of the High Court after the first attempt was struck off the roll in the High Court of South Africa, North West Division, Mahikeng. The NEC members were expelled following the 34th Ordinary Congress held at the Birchwood Hotel & Conference Centre in the East of Johannesburg in May 2026.

The four (4) members – Emma Hendricks, Gladwyn White, Orapeleng Setlhare and Monde Montshiwa – approached the Mafikeng High Court to challenge and reverse their initial suspensions and subsequent expulsions. They lost this challenge and the matter was struck from the roll.

The latest ruling brings, for the time being, to an end a prolonged course of urgent litigation in which the four repeatedly withdrew or amended their case when faced with procedural shortcomings or substantive opposition, instead of allowing the dispute to be adjudicated on its merits.

This outcome brings to four the number of urgent hearings SAFA has had to defend in relation to this single dispute, across two divisions of the High Court, without the Applicants ever allowing a court to determine the matter on its merits. SAFA maintains that the underlying decisions were lawful governance resolutions, validly adopted by Congress acting within its powers under the SAFA Statutes.

SAFA notes that the urgent court process exists to determine matters that genuinely require immediate judicial intervention, and is not a forum for litigants to test successive versions of the same case until one is regarded as sufficiently persuasive. The costs order on Scale B reflects the seriousness with which the Court viewed this pattern of conduct.

SAFA remains committed to good governance, the integrity of its constitutional structures, and the development of football in South Africa, and will continue to defend its governance decisions robustly against any further attempts to re-litigate this matter.

South African Football: Kaizer Chiefs is one of the most popular and successful football clubs in South Africa.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Category: News, SportTag: Football, SAFAnet

If you feel strongly about this article then feel free to send MyZA a ‘Letter to the Editor’ using the submission form below:


Letter to the Editor

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
If this is in response to an article please include that article title here or as the lead in for the first paragraph of your Letter below.

Separate tags with commas

Localise your letter by naming the city your words are about. Add relevant words describing your subject. Single comma separated words of no more than 5
Your Name(Required)
Your Name will be linked to the website below.
Your personal, business or social media web site
Choose NO to not set up a user account on MyZA. User Accounts will allow you to submit letters under your own Author Name

3 Latest Letters to the Editor:

  • Fun South African fact

    Dear Editor Fun South African fact: towns like Franschhoek and Stellenbosch are home to world-class wine farms set in stunning, scenic surroundings. Regards Aressa Smith In Response to/From: Luxury Properties Seized in New Lottery Crackdown

    27 January 2026
  • Condolences on the Passing of Lusanda Dumke

    Statement by Leander Kruger MPL – DA Buffalo City Constituency Leader: The Democratic Alliance in Buffalo City Metropolitan Municipality mourns the passing of Springbok Women’s rugby player and Mdantsane trailblazer, Lusanda Dumke, who lost her battle with cancer at the age of 28. South Africa has lost an exceptional athlete, a leader, and a source…

    17 December 2025
  • Rape Kits Delivered, But…

    Statement by Nicholas Gotsell MP – DA NCOP Member on Security & Justice: The DA can confirm that 2 840 rape kits arrived in Cape Town on Monday, following sustained DA oversight and pressure after multiple police stations across the Western Cape were found to be without this critical forensic evidence tool. While this delivery…

    17 December 2025

About Guest

Previous Post:Currie Cup Bulletin #16
Next Post:Piecemeal Announcements Provide neither Certainty nor Transparency

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Back Bett

    2 August 2026 at 10:53 pm

    Sport Trivia: Which South African who played between 1949 and 1960 was named a Wisden Cricketer of the year in 1956? Answer: Hugh Tayfield. Hugh Tayfield once bowled 137 consecutive dot balls in a 1956/57 Test match against England which was held in Durban. Statistics for bowlers who have played 20 or more tests show that Hugh Tayfield conceded only 1.64 runs per over during his test career.

  2. Achilles Mountain

    2 August 2026 at 9:31 pm

    If I agreed with you then we would both be wrong

Copyright © 2026 · MyZA · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Reach Trust