Meet the Moms Making Maths Fun
MathMoms trains women on the Cape Flats to teach children maths
Financial literacy
Law Enforcement Officers Arrests Expose Deeper Failure in City’s Safety Governance
GOOD notes the arrest of two Law Enforcement officers by the Western Cape Anti-Corruption Unit on 13 January 2026, following a corruption sting in Parow. The officers allegedly demanded a R3 000 bribe from a motorist instead of enforcing the law. We commend the members of the public who did the right thing and the Anti-Corruption Unit for acting decisively.
The post LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS ARRESTS EXPOSE DEEPER FAILURE IN DA-LED CITY’S SAFETY GOVERNANCE appeared first on For Good.
What Nigeria’s High Poverty Rate Has to Do with Ethnic Conflicts
Poverty is the common thread across the places experiencing terrorism in Nigeria.
Creditworthy and Misunderstood: New Data Challenges Lender Assumptions About Young Consumers
South Africa’s younger credit-eligible consumers present significant growth opportunities for lenders if they can overcome persistent market assumptions that currently shape risk appetite and acquisition strategies.
These assumptions include that younger consumers do not value credit, they are disengaged from the credit market, are irresponsible with debt, have low appetite for new credit, lack loyalty to lenders, and struggle to meet payment obligations.
They could also partly explain South Africa’s low 13% credit card market penetration among both Millennials (aged 29 to 44) and Gen Z (aged 18 to 28). Furthermore, Gen Z consumers adopt credit cards and personal loans at half the rate that Millennials did at the same age, suggesting limited growth for lenders as these consumers age.
“Our research suggests systemic barriers to credit access in South Africa, rather than a lack of demand,” said Ayesha Hatea, director of research and consulting at TransUnion South Africa. “It also highlights that lenders have opportunities to innovate in product design, onboarding and education to empower these consumers to manage everyday expenses and unexpected financial needs as they progress towards achieving key life milestones.”
To challenge perceptions about younger consumers, TransUnion South Africa conducted a focused study[1] to test lenders’ perceptions, analysing participation, engagement and repayment behaviour among the country’s 4.3 million credit-active population aged 18 to 30.
Myth 1: Younger consumers don’t value credit
More than six in 10 (62%) younger consumers believe that access to credit is important to achieve their financial goals[2], with 76% saying that credit can give them access to new opportunities that could lead to a better quality of life. Younger consumers’ favourable perception of credit exceeds that of older consumers, 57% of whom believe access is important, and 71% of whom believe that access to credit can unlock new opportunities. However, less than a quarter (24%) of young consumers view credit as a risk to prudent financial management.
“Younger consumers increasingly see credit as a way to achieve their financial goals – even more so than older consumers,” Hatea said. “With most disagreeing that applying for credit signals poor financial management, it’s clear that opportunities exist for segment-focused products supported by financial literacy initiatives.”
Myth 2: Younger consumers are disengaged and don’t participate in the credit market
Nearly four in 10 (39%) young consumers feel that they have sufficient access to credit and lending products, with 49% believing that they would be approved for a credit product if they needed one.
It’s worth noting that, over time, consumers’ choice of credit product shifts. Reviewing credit card originations across a six-year period showed similar trends across time: 2% of 18 year old credit active consumers hold a credit card, compared to 19% of 30 year olds. Their participation in secured credit products increases with age, reaching parity with the general population by 30 and reflecting life stage realities like income, affordability and asset ownership, rather than disengagement.
“These shifts show that young consumers are engaged with the credit market, particularly with unsecured products, but their participation evolves across product types and life stages,” Hatea said.
Myth 3: Younger consumers are irresponsible in leveraging debt
Credit utilisation and average balances are well aligned with risk-based access that improves with age. At age 21, 95% of consumers are classified as subprime, dropping to 74% by age 30, reflecting a maturing credit profile.
Despite limited access, younger borrowers demonstrate measured usage: the average credit card balance at age 21 is R11,000, rising to R24,000 by age 30, while utilisation among near-prime consumers increases from 58% to 78% over the same age range.
“These trends highlight responsible engagement with credit and clearly refute the myth that younger consumers overextend their credit exposure, or are reckless with credit,” Hatea said. “As young consumers gain access to larger loan amounts, they move into better risk categories, reflecting greater lender trust in recognition of responsible repayment behaviour.”
Myth 4: Younger consumers have a low appetite for credit, and lack loyalty to lenders
While one third (33%) of the general population intends to apply for new credit within the next year, this increases to 45% for Gen Z consumers. Additionally, 36% of these consumers inquired about new credit over the six years studies, compared to 28% of all consumers. However, only 3.4% of younger consumers return to their first lender for new credit – similar to the 3.6% average across all consumers.
“The data shows that younger consumers do indeed have appetite for credit, while revealing that South African consumers in general are not particularly loyal to their credit providers,” Hatea said. “To build loyalty and retain younger consumers, lenders should invest in early-stage experiences, personalised engagement, and relevant products that build lasting relationships.”
Myth 5: Younger consumes struggle to keep up with their payment obligations
Interestingly, younger consumers show significantly lower risk of delinquency at 30 days past due (DPD) in the first year after opening credit cards, although this rises as they get older: there was a 17% delinquency rate among near prime 18 to 22 year olds, while 30 year olds displayed a 24% delinquency rate.
However, for non-bank loans and bank loans, younger consumers (18 to 24 years old) show slightly higher delinquency rates than older consumers, although younger consumers, especially those aged 23 to 25, perform better than the industry average. This indicates that lender type influences delinquency outcomes, and that younger borrowers may respond differently to the structure, support, or perception of a lender’s credit.
“Younger consumers are effectively managing their loans when compared to industry averages across most products,” said Hatea. “They’re not broadly higher risk, but they may be more vulnerable in certain lending contexts, particularly non-bank personal loans, where product design, support, or affordability may not be well aligned to their needs. Higher delinquency rates on non-bank personal loans can be addressed through early default detection tools.
“By focusing on education, wallet growth, loyalty, alternative data to measure risk, and proactive risk management, lenders can support younger consumers and drive long-term, sustainable growth among these consumers and in the broader credit market,” she said. “Well-managed credit can also be a catalyst for broader economic growth in South Africa.”
[1] TransUnion South Africa conducted a focused study to test lenders’ perceptions of consumers aged 18 to 30, analysing participation, engagement and repayment behaviour among the country’s credit-active population in this age group. Data was studied across four time frames (September in 2018, 2022, 2023 and 2024), and included age, risk score, open products in wallet, credit lines, average balances by product and credit utilisation at commencement of the study, new products opened, line assignments and opening loan amounts for six months, and delinquency rates on newly opened products for 12 months. These were compared to overall market averages to evaluate gaps and opportunities.
[2] According to TransUnion’s Q2 2025 Consumer Pulse Survey of 922 adults aged 18 or older, residing in South Africa conducted May 5–25, 2025 by TransUnion in partnership with third-party research provider, Dynata.
TransUnion Study Reveals Key Insights Into South Africa’s FinTech Borrowers as Market Poised for Growth
- TransUnion analysis reveals actionable insights for FinTech lenders seeking to navigate market complexities to achieve growth targets
- FinTech lending is not the main gateway to financial inclusion, with most consumers choosing a clothing account as their first credit product
- FinTech borrowers are loyal when it comes to subsequent products, but FinTech lenders are lower in consumers’ payment hierarchy than other lender types
TransUnion’s latest research into South Africa’s FinTech lending market reveals critical insights into borrower behaviour, loyalty and risk based on an analysis of 4.3 million South Africa consumers. The study highlights patterns that present both opportunities and challenges when navigating a rapidly digitising credit ecosystem.
South Africa’s FinTech sector is undergoing rapid transformation, signalling a major shift in how consumers will engage with credit in the next five years, and beyond. As digital adoption accelerates, lenders will need to adapt their approach to South African consumers if they’re to attract, retain and grow relationships with digitally engaged borrowers.
Emerging FinTechs are offering diverse solutions such as buy now, pay later (BNPL) loans with interest free payments, flexible financing for small and medium enterprises, point-of-sale credit and insurance coverage. Financial services are now more accessible than ever before. However, it’s essential that the lenders behind these solutions understand who is using them, how they engage with credit, and whether borrowers’ loyalty can help drive sustainable growth.
“As competition intensifies and regulatory frameworks evolve, lenders must go beyond product innovation and develop a deeper understanding of consumer behaviour,” said Ayesha Hatea, director of research and consulting at TransUnion South Africa. “Our study offers a data-driven lens into the FinTech borrower profile, helping lenders build loyalty, manage risk, and drive inclusion.”
TransUnion analysed South Africans who held at least one open FinTech credit obligation in Q4 2024, including long-term personal loans, short-term personal loans and credit cards, to learn more about the consumers driving growth in the sector. The study examined risk profiles, delinquency trends, product breadth, and loyalty patterns among FinTech borrowers. Further, the study compared those characteristics to similar-risk consumers using traditional lender products only (non-FinTech borrowers[1]), providing a deeper understanding of growth opportunities for South Africa’s credit market.
Five Themes Shaping FinTech Lending Strategy
1. FinTechs are not yet the main gateway to financial inclusion.
Despite South Africa’s high mobile penetration[2], 69% of New-to-Credit consumers – those with no prior reported credit history – enter the market via retail accounts, with clothing accounts being the most common first product. FinTechs have an opportunity to reposition themselves as enablers of financial inclusion by partnering with retailers and mobile ecosystems to reach underserved segments.
2. FinTech borrowers are concentrated in below prime risk tiers[3].
While many FinTech borrowers have experience managing credit, 95% of FinTech borrowers with 0–1 month loans are in below prime risk tiers, compared to 29% for bank borrowers and 69% for non-bank lender borrowers. For 2–12 month loans, 94% of FinTech borrowers are below prime, in contrast to 58% for banks and 50% for non-banks. This highlights greater risk exposure among the FinTech borrower base and suggests that FinTech lenders could benefit from leveraging trended and alternative data to better predict repayment risk and reduce delinquency rates, particularly among below-prime borrowers.
3. FinTech borrowers are not all underserved.
Among 0–1 month term borrowers, 44% of FinTech consumers already hold two or three credit products and 27% hold four or more, debunking the assumption that FinTech borrowers have limited access to credit. Additionally, more than 56% of FinTech personal loan borrowers hold credit products with non-FinTech lenders. These multi-lender relationships underscore the need for lenders to view borrowing patterns holistically and better understand the reasons why borrowers may be seeking credit from different lender types, in order to develop strategies for capturing more of their customers’ wallets.
4. FinTech borrowers underperform on repayments.
While there are no material differences by lender type for longer-term loans, there are significant differences for 0-1 month loans. This is an important consideration as these shorter-term loans are more likely to be used by borrowers earlier in their credit journeys when they are potentially more financially vulnerable. After controlling for borrower risk score, delinquency rates (consumers 2+ months in arrears on a loan) were highest among FinTech borrowers: The consumer-level delinquencies were 74% for 0–1 month loans from FinTechs compared to lower rates for bank loans (53%) and non-bank lender loans (53%), underscoring the need for enhanced risk management strategies tailored to the FinTech segment.
5. FinTech borrowers are loyal to FinTech lenders
TransUnion’s research provides compelling evidence of borrower loyalty within the FinTech lending ecosystem. Among consumers who originated a 0–1 month personal loan, 65% opened another 0–1 month loan within 12 months, and 93% of those chose a FinTech lender. More than one fifth (21%) of these borrowers progressed to a 2–12 month loan, with 80% remaining with FinTech providers.
Among consumers who started with a 2–12 month personal loan, 95% opened another 2–12 month loan, with 60% choosing a FinTech lender. In addition, 85% of these borrowers also opened a 0–1 month loan, and 38% did so with FinTech lenders. These patterns demonstrate a strong preference among borrowers to remain within the FinTech category, even as they take loans over longer time periods. This loyalty presents a strategic opportunity for FinTech lenders to deepen relationships through personalised engagement, targeted product offerings, and proactive risk management.
However, loyalty in product originations does not necessarily translate into repayment prioritisation. When consumers hold loans with both FinTech and non-FinTech lenders, they tend to prioritise repayments to traditional institutions. Among consumers with 2–12 term personal loans from both FinTech and non-FinTech non-bank lenders, delinquency measured as 1+ month in arrears was 33% for FinTechs, compared to 26% for non-FinTech non-bank lenders. Similarly, for those with loans from both FinTechs and banks, delinquency was 30% for FinTechs versus 28% for banks.
The takeaway for lenders is that while FinTech borrowers are loyal in terms of repeat borrowing, they may deprioritise FinTech repayments when under financial pressure. This highlights the need for FinTech lenders to strengthen their engagement strategies, build trust, and implement early intervention tools to improve repayment outcomes and long-term value.
“If lenders are to benefit from the anticipated growth in the FinTech lending market, it’s essential that they offer financial literacy and awareness education to help consumers understand how responsible credit use can support their financial goals. Once consumers have opened FinTech-issued products, lenders can activate lifestyle triggers to anticipate consumer progression so that they can deliver timely, relevant engagement to drive loyalty and long-term value. This can be further supported by deploying predelinquency models to identify early signs of consumer stress, and to initiate recovery efforts before risk escalates,” said Hatea.
[1] FinTech consumers were those with an open FinTech long-term personal loan, short-term personal loan, or credit card. Non-FinTech consumers were a control group with no FinTech obligations of any type in their history, who held a long-term personal loan, short term personal loan or credit card from a non-FinTech lender
[2] 118,600,000 connections across 60,690,000 people https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2024-south-africa
[3] Scores are based on TransUnion’s CreditVision® generic scoring methodology. Risk distribution key: subprime (0-625), near prime (626-655), prime (656-695), prime plus (696-720), super prime (721-999).
Why South Africans Are Over-Insured, Under-Protected – And What Needs to Change
Nearly two-thirds of South African household income is swallowed by debt repayments. Yet insurance penetration remains alarmingly low at just 11.54% in 2024, with the bulk of policies being funeral cover. Life, health, and asset insurance lag far behind, while many consumers hold overlapping or unsuitable financial products, often without fully understanding what they’re paying …