This is what we can execute to conclude the reading crisis

The promulgation of current regulations would succor tackle the reading crisis, says the author. But law reform is not enough.

On 30 August, the Accurate to Read campaign was launched at the Women’s Jail in Johannesburg. The campaign brings together several organisations, including the Legal Resources Centre, the Centre for Child Law, SECTION27, Equal Education (EE), and Equal Education Law Centre (EELC) to mobilise civil society to design early-grade literacy a national priority. But the road ahead will be hard.

The campaign launch comes a few months after the shocking results of the Pace in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) were released, revealing that 81% of Grade 4 learners in South Africa cannot read for meaning in any language, including their home language. As we trace International Literacy Day on Thursday 7 September, we must soberly reflect on the action required to finish the national reading crisis.

One of the core strategies of the Correct to Read campaign is to motivate for binding reading regulations. These regulations would clarify the state’s obligations in relation to the ‘four T’s’: the time that must be spent on teaching literacy; the training that all foundation phase teachers must receive to ensure they are equipped to teach children to read; the texts that must be provided to teachers and learners; and the regular testing of learners to gauge their ability to read for meaning.

At the EELC, we recognise that law reform is necessary and indispensable. Reading regulations would bring together law and policy and manufacture crystal clear the state’s obligations in relation to reading. Equally, however, we know that law is honest one tool in the activist arsenal. Experience shows that apt laws on their own are not enough. Time and again, we acquire seen Herculean efforts made to secure laws that – at least in principle – protect and advance different aspects of the accurate to basic education. But people are let down when it comes to the implementation of those laws.

An example is the continuing failure of the Department of Basic Education (DBE) to meet the norms and standards for school infrastructure.

Since it was formed in 2008, Equal Education has been campaigning to #FixOurSchools. On 29 November 2013, norms and standards for school infrastructure were finally promulgated. The norms and standards were a victory, in that they set minimum requirements for things like classroom and class sizes and included deadlines for the DBE to meet.

Among other things, the norms and standards required that all public schools must maintain libraries within ten years: in other words, by 29 November 2023. Yet, EE’s research shows that 70% of public schools still carry out not gain libraries. In addition, a third of school libraries are not stocked. This means four out of five public schools either maintain no library, or a library without books. The deadline for provision of libraries looms large. It is another deadline that education departments are poised to miss.

The attitude of the DBE towards its legal obligation to provide libraries is disturbing.

On 1 June, not long after the PIRLS results were released, the Minister for Basic Education held a meeting with civil society. She spoke about the results, their causes, and the actions the DBE plans to catch in response. She also invited questions from participants.

The EELC took this opportunity to inquire whether and how the DBE will be meeting its 2023 deadline for the provision of libraries in schools.

The Minister’s response was astonishing. She appeared unaware that the norms and standards require that all public schools acquire libraries before the cease of the year. And she said this in any event is not going to happen. Her comments produce it very clear that laws are not, on their own, enough to secure state action.

What finish we at the EELC reflect this means for the Accurate to Read campaign?

First, it means recognising that current reading regulations would honest be one piece of the puzzle. We must implement what we already gain. When public schools believe overcrowded classrooms, no libraries, and no books, how can you expect a child to be able to read? The norms and standards for school infrastructure area legal obligations on the DBE to remedy this situation. The DBE must be held accountable for failing to meet those obligations.

We must also recognise that the regulatory framework for basic education already covers teacher qualifications, the curriculum, testing, and more. So the content of reading regulations will to be carefully crafted, to ensure that the regulations add value and finish not create modern inconsistencies or confusions. Done factual, reading regulations acquire the potential to bring coherence and clarity to the fragmented law and policy landscape.

Second, communities must be central in the development and implementation of the regulations. This means that the content regulations must be developed alongside affected communities – particularly learners, parents, grandparents, caregivers, and teachers at quintile 1 to 3 schools, which are mostly made up of previously disadvantaged schools.

And if and when reading regulations are promulgated, people must be empowered with knowledge and understanding of their content. What enact the regulations mean in concrete terms? What are people’s entitlements?

A key portion of the EELC’s model is creating and sharing popular education materials. This will be essential to ensure that the DBE is held accountable, and the regulations translate into meaningful and community-driven change on the ground.

Third, we must acknowledge and support other efforts to realise the factual to read, over and above laws and their implementation.

To give honest one example, in 2010, EE established the Bookery in Cape Town. The Bookery is now an independent sister organisation to EE. It takes donations of books suitable for either primary or secondary school learners and distributes them to schools committed to establishing a library.

There are countless more initiatives to further the right to read – initiatives which were started, and which can design gains, despite the problems with the legal framework. In campaigning for regulations, we must not overlook the continuing importance of these initiatives.

Excellent laws – while necessary and necessary – are not enough. To finish the reading crisis, we will need to muster all our resources.

Kazim is a Legal Researcher at the Equal Education Law Centre. This article is adapted from the Centre’s presentation at the Factual to Read campaign launch on 30 August 2023. Views expressed are not necessarily those of GroundUp.

Read More at GroundUp