• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MyZA

MyZA

News, Directory, Events and Other Stuff

  • Social Media
  • Sport
  • World News
  • Home
  • Submit News
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Stratlec
  • TFSA
  • News
    • APO
    • Today’s Sport News
    • Todays Social Media and Tech Headlines
    • Today’s World News
    • Today’s SA Financial News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / Judeg: Complain to the Press Ombud rather than the courts

Judeg: Complain to the Press Ombud rather than the courts

9 August 2023 by Guest

Judge Ingrid Opperman says Lemane Sithole and Michael Maile’s application “abused the court process”

The urgent court application brought against Media24 and its journalists to prohibit them from referring to Lemane Sithole and Michael Maile as members of the “Alex Mafia” has been struck from the court’s urgent roll.

  • A Johannesburg High Court judge says a litigant approaching the urgent court should elaborate why they believe not pursued faster remedies through the Press Council, particularly where they threatened to execute so.
  • The case before the court was an urgent application brought by Lemane Sithole and Michael Maile against News24 and Netwerk 24 and some of its journalists, for an interim interdict prohibiting them from referring to them as members of the “Alex Mafia”.
  • The judge said that because the term “Alex Mafia” had been used by many other publications and had first been used about 16 years ago, that the matter was not urgent.
  • She also found that the application was “an abusive attempt by two politically-connected businessmen to gag a targeted newsroom”.

A Johannesburg High Court judge has urged those with grievances against the press to use “speedier remedies” available through the Press Council rather than making urgent court applications.

Judge Ingrid Opperman, in her ruling on Tuesday, said this did not mean that a litigant could not approach a court for relief against a Press Council member, without approaching the council itself first.

“Of course they can. Rather it means that a litigant approaching the urgent court should clarify why they maintain not pursued the potentially speeder remedies available from the Press Council, particularly where they believe threatened to enact so.”

The case before Judge Opperman was an urgent application brought by Lemane Sithole and Michael Maile, against Media24 and some of its journalists, for an interim interdict prohibiting them from referring to them as members of the “Alex Mafia”.

This was pending defamation action Sithole and Maile said that they would still launch against the media house and the journalists.

Judge Opperman said the largely undisputed facts were that both applicants had close relationships with current Deputy President Paul Mashatile during the years of the struggle. They subsequently worked and did business together.

Since 2007 various articles maintain been published naming them as the “Alex Mafia”. These gain appeared in a wide range of publications.

Judge Opperman said News24 Editor Adriaan Basson had, in his affidavit, said: “We did not coin the term Alex Mafia. It originated in political circles, in fact with the ANC itself.”

He pointed to an interview Mashatile had done with the Financial Mail in which he said the term referred to a group of 1980s comrades who went on to serve in government.

Opperman said the applicants’ advocate argued that while it might gain had an innocuous meaning up until 2022, this changed when the journalists started adding words such as “gang”, “mob” and “notorious” last year.

The judge said this did not bolster his argument that the matter should be heard urgently. And if the term “Alex Mafia” was defamatory, as had been argued, then the applicants ought to maintain approached the court much sooner, in fact 16 years ago, the judge said.

“For many years, as Basson’s affidavit has demonstrated, the internet has been replete with references to the applicants as ‘Alex Mafia’. The applicants did nothing about it. The fact that the reference has been repeated more recently does not produce the matter suddenly urgent.”

On the Press Council’s role, Judge Opperman said: “An urgent remedy at the Press Council was apparently there for the taking.”

“I am driven to conclude that this application is an abusive attempt by two politically-connected businessmen to gag a targeted newsroom from using a nickname by which the applicants are popularly known and called by the public, politicians, political commentators, other newsrooms and themselves – and maintain been for at least 16 years.

“They acquire abused the court process, claiming urgency where there is none … multiple other media houses maintain published pieces along the same lines, yet no interdict is sought against them,” she said.

The judge said an interdict prohibiting publication, whether interim or final, was known as a judicial prior restraint, or more colloquially as a banning or gagging order, which infringed on the accurate to freedom of expression and freedom of the media. Because of this, the courts had set a very high threshold for an interdict against allegedly defamatory speech.

If granted, any interdict, would not “scrub the internet of the many existing references” and would not ban third parties from calling them by that nickname.

“What then is this application about? It appears … designed to punish the respondents, to produce an example of them and thereby to send a chilling message to other media and members of the public that they risk being hauled to the urgent court to face opprobrium from politically connected figures of influence and resources and risk heavy costs orders, if they use the nickname.”

Judge Opperman struck the matter from the roll, and ordered Sithole and Maile to pay costs on a punitive scale.

© 2023 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and execute not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.

We assign an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We finish not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We carry out not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please execute not delete the invisible pixel.

Read More at GroundUp

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Category: NewsTag: business, Government, GroundUp, Johannesburg

If you feel strongly about this article then feel free to send MyZA a ‘Letter to the Editor’ using the submission form below:


Letter to the Editor

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
If this is in response to an article please include that article title here or as the lead in for the first paragraph of your Letter below.

Separate tags with commas

Localise your letter by naming the city your words are about. Add relevant words describing your subject. Single comma separated words of no more than 5
Your Name(Required)
Your Name will be linked to the website below.
Your personal, business or social media web site
Choose NO to not set up a user account on MyZA. User Accounts will allow you to submit letters under your own Author Name

3 Latest Letters to the Editor:

  • NSFAS 2027 applications close on 31 October — SASSA households, apply now

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. NSFAS applications for the 2027 academic year close on Friday 31 October 2026, and no extension is expected. If your household receives a SASSA grant, your child already passes the NSFAS financial eligibility test — but they still have to…

    25 October 2026
  • Publish the Call, Then Publish the Grade

    Dear Editor, South African football fans argue about everything — lineups, referees, who should start up front. But there’s one argument we never have, because nobody gives us the numbers: were the predictions we read all week actually any good? I help run XG Mind AI, a small independent football data lab. Our rule is…

    25 October 2026
  • Don’t Ignore a SASSA Review Notice — It Is Not a Cancellation

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. SASSA has reminded beneficiaries that a grant review is not a cancellation. A review simply checks whether a beneficiary still meets the qualifying requirements — it can be triggered by a change in income, employment, marital status, address, contact details…

    19 October 2026

About Guest

Previous Post:Enhance Your Living Spaces with a Wide Range of Indoor and Outdoor Lighting Solutions
Next Post:Supporting and Inspiring Women to Turn Spaces into Dreams

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Noisecake

    6 September 2026 at 10:22 pm

    Braai – a barbecue [brr-rye] Also known as a barbecue where steak, lamb chops and of course ‘boerewors’ is cooked on a grid over wood and flames. Add some salads, rolls and ‘melktert’ for dessert and you are set for a traditional South African braai.

  2. Steel Heart

    4 September 2026 at 3:07 am

    Fun South African Fact: Towns like Franschhoek and Stellenbosch boast world-class wine farms in beautiful settings.

Copyright © 2026 · MyZA · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Stratlec Online