• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MyZA

MyZA

News, Directory, Events and Other Stuff

  • Social Media
  • Sport
  • World News
  • Home
  • Submit News
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Stratlec
  • TFSA
  • News
    • APO
    • Today’s Sport News
    • Todays Social Media and Tech Headlines
    • Today’s World News
    • Today’s SA Financial News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / Eskom’s Over R41.4 Billion in Contract Expansions

Eskom’s Over R41.4 Billion in Contract Expansions

18 October 2026 by Guest

Statement by Kevin Mileham MP – DA Spokesperson on Electricity and Energy:

South Africans face another 8.83% electricity tariff increase next year, while Eskom has reportedly added R41.4 billion to existing contracts without putting the additional work through a new competitive procurement process.

An investigation by the Sunday Times found that Eskom accounted for nearly 60% of the R69.6 billion in contract expansions across national departments and state entities between October 2023 and March 2026. Eskom alone accounted for 847 expansions, with the recorded justification reportedly being little more than the word “expansion”.

One engineering and project-management contract at Medupi and Kusile, originally awarded for R114 million in 2006, has reportedly grown to approximately R2.5 billion. Another R437 million was added in June 2025 alone.

For five consecutive years, Eskom has received qualified audit opinions. Its auditors have repeatedly identified weaknesses in procurement and contract management, including being unable to verify whether certain contracts were awarded at reasonable prices. Yet Eskom has now been identified as responsible for R41.4 billion in contract expansions over just two and a half years.

Eskom needs to explain why so much additional work was allocated through existing contracts rather than competitive tenders. If contracts were repeatedly expanded because replacement tenders were not completed on time, that points to a serious failure of procurement planning. Consumers should not be expected to carry the cost of such failures.

The DA will request that Parliament’s Portfolio Committee on Electricity and Energy call Eskom’s leadership to account. We want a full breakdown of these expansions, the reasons they were approved, who authorised them and what evidence exists that the prices paid represented value for money. We also want to know whether any of the expenditure has been classified as irregular and what consequences have followed.

Contract expansions may be legally permissible, but that does not automatically make them necessary or cost-effective. Eskom has an obligation under the Public Finance Management Act to maintain proper procurement controls and safeguard public resources.

Before Eskom asks consumers to pay another 8.83% more for electricity, it should explain why R41.4 billion was added to existing contracts and produce the evidence that those expansions represented value for money.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Category: NewsTag: Letter

If you feel strongly about this article then feel free to send MyZA a ‘Letter to the Editor’ using the submission form below:


Letter to the Editor

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
If this is in response to an article please include that article title here or as the lead in for the first paragraph of your Letter below.

Separate tags with commas

Localise your letter by naming the city your words are about. Add relevant words describing your subject. Single comma separated words of no more than 5
Your Name(Required)
Your Name will be linked to the website below.
Your personal, business or social media web site
Choose NO to not set up a user account on MyZA. User Accounts will allow you to submit letters under your own Author Name

3 Latest Letters to the Editor:

  • Don’t Ignore a SASSA Review Notice — It Is Not a Cancellation

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. SASSA has reminded beneficiaries that a grant review is not a cancellation. A review simply checks whether a beneficiary still meets the qualifying requirements — it can be triggered by a change in income, employment, marital status, address, contact details…

    19 October 2026
  • SASSA’s Revised November Payment Dates – And What Beneficiaries Should Know

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. SASSA has revised its November 2026 payment dates around the 4 November municipal elections: Older Persons grants will be paid on 30 October (Friday), Disability grants on 2 November (Monday), and Children’s grants on 3 November (Tuesday), with review-related grants…

    16 October 2026
  • Thoughts on Lotto Winner News

    Dear Editor This is fantastic news for the community of Gqeberha. It is always heartwarming to hear about such life-changing positive outcomes for everyday people. Congratulations to the lucky winner! Regards Buhle Ngcobo In Response to/From: R8.5 Million Lotto Winner Claims Prize in Gqeberha

    13 October 2026

About Guest

Previous Post:National Opt-Out Registry to help consumers block spam calls – SABC News – Breaking news, special reports, world, business, sport coverage of all South African current events. Africa’s news leader. | SA News
Next Post:Amogelang Tatai and Glenrose Xaba Claim Elite Titles at 2026 Boxer Super Run Durban

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Bones

    18 October 2026 at 4:18 pm

    A Priest was seated next to Van Der Merwe on a flight to Brakpan.

    After the plane was airborne, drink orders were taken.

    Van Der Merwe asked for a Rum and Coke, which was brought and placed before him.

    The flight attendant then asked the priest if he would like a drink.

    He replied in disgust \”I\’d rather be savagely raped by a dozen whores than let liquor touch my lips.\”

    Van Der Merwe then handed his drink back to the attendant and said \”Me too, I didn\’t know we had a choice.\”

    Reply
  2. goldman

    18 October 2026 at 4:18 pm

    What\’s the difference between an ANC MP and a flying pig?

    The letter F.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Copyright © 2026 · MyZA · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Stratlec Online