• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MyZA

MyZA

News, Directory, Events and Other Stuff

  • Social Media
  • Sport
  • World News
  • Home
  • Submit News
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Stratlec
  • TFSA
  • News
    • APO
    • Today’s Sport News
    • Todays Social Media and Tech Headlines
    • Today’s World News
    • Today’s SA Financial News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / MyPR / Green on the Label, Not the Land: What Some Bottled Water Brands Aren’t Telling You

Green on the Label, Not the Land: What Some Bottled Water Brands Aren’t Telling You

16 March 2026 by Guest

South Africa’s shelves are full of bottled water making bold environmental promises. But are those claims as clean as the water inside? SANBWA CEO Charlotte Metcalf explains what to look for and what to watch out for. Walk down any supermarket aisle and you’ll see it: water bottles adorned with leaves, mountains and promises of …

South Africa’s shelves are full of bottled water making bold environmental promises. But are those claims as clean as the water inside? SANBWA CEO Charlotte Metcalf explains what to look for and what to watch out for.

Walk down any supermarket aisle and you’ll see it: water bottles adorned with leaves, mountains and promises of a greener tomorrow. Restaurants, speciality shops and hotels regularly insist on green options to impress their clientele. Words like “environmentally responsible, renewable and recyclable”, “plastic-free”, 100% recyclable”, “eco-friendly”, “biodegradable” and “compostable” are doing a lot of heavy lifting on packaging these days, but the reality behind many of these claims simply does not hold up.

This is greenwashing: when environmental marketing gets ahead of environmental reality only to sell a product based on misinformed perception. And it’s a growing problem for consumers who genuinely want to make better choices.

The fact that something is recyclable does not ensure that it actually gets recycled. Someone has to pick it out of general waste, sort it and transport it to a specialised facility that recycles it into an end product that can be used while creating an economically viable market for it. This is simply not available in South Africa for all packaging materials like cartons and biodegradable bottles.
Some brands using packaging alternatives to PET like cartons, tins and glass, capitalising on the anti-plastic sentiments, making unsubstantiated claims to fool the consumer into thinking that they are making a more environmentally friendly choice. We’ve taken this opportunity to unpack some of those claims.

The ‘Compostable’ Claim
One of the most misleading claims appearing on water bottles and packaging is “compostable”. It sounds simple enough. Toss it in your compost heap and it disappears. The truth is far more complicated.

Compostable plastics only break down under very specific industrial conditions: sustained temperatures of around 60°C, controlled moisture and the right microbial environment. These conditions are nothing like your garden compost bin, a landfill or the natural environment. And critically, South Africa currently has no widespread consumer collection system to get packaging to large-scale industrial composting facilities… even if they existed.

What actually happens to most “compostable” bottles in South Africa? They go to landfill, where they persist for years, or they contaminate the PET recycling stream, causing entire batches of genuinely recyclable plastic to be rejected.

Metcalf says: “Compostable and biodegradable bottles cannot be reused or conventionally recycled in South Africa. They only decompose under very specific industrial composting conditions that simply don’t exist at scale here. A single so-called eco-friendly bottle dropped into a recycling bin can contaminate an entire batch of recyclable PET, effectively sending hundreds of bottles to landfill instead.”

Not as Simple as It Sounds
Similar problems plague “biodegradable” claims. While technically true that these materials can break down, the speed and conditions required are rarely communicated honestly. In cold, dry or low-oxygen environments, like most South African landfills, degradation is dramatically slowed.

Worse, when some of these materials do begin to break down, they don’t disappear into harmless nutrients. They fragment into microplastics and release carbon dioxide, contributing to both pollution and greenhouse gas emissions. The South African Bureau of Standards has published SANS 1728, which sets testing and certification requirements for these claims, yet many products on shelves carry no such verified certification.

The Labelling Problem
Greenwashing doesn’t always come from bold, false statements. More often it’s in the details – or the lack of them. Recycling symbols are placed on packaging that isn’t actually collected for recycling in South Africa. Terms like “eco-friendly” and “nature-friendly” carry no legal definition and require no proof. A bottle made with 10% recycled content might use language that implies it’s fully sustainable.

South Africa’s Advertising Regulatory Board is currently developing a Sustainability Code to crack down on vague or misleading environmental claims; a sign that regulators are beginning to take this seriously. But until enforceable standards are fully in place, the burden falls heavily on consumers to be sceptical.

“If a claim influences how you choose a product, it must be backed by proof,” says Metcalf. “Vague language and unverified symbols are not good enough. Consumers deserve transparency, not marketing theatre.”

What Actually Works
Here’s the good news: South Africa does have a packaging material with a proven, high-functioning circular economy: PET plastic. In 2023, PET recycling company Petco achieved a 64% collection rate for PET beverage bottles, surpassing the government’s own target. Every PET bottle recycled means less waste in the environment, less virgin material produced and income for the informal waste pickers who form a critical part of the collection network.

SANBWA members, , are required to comply with strict environmental standards as part of their membership. This includes adhering to the Waste Act, contributing to a recycling levy, designing packaging to be recyclable and undergoing annual independent audits. It’s accountability that can actually be verified.

“Bottled water has the lightest environmental footprint of any packaged beverage and recycling the bottle reduces that footprint by a further 25%. That’s a real, measurable impact. It’s not a slogan on a label,” says Metcalf.

How to Spot Greenwashing
Next time you pick up a water bottle, ask yourself a few simple questions. Does the ‘recyclable’ claim come with any indication of where to recycle it? Is the ‘compostable’ or ‘biodegradable’ label backed by a recognised certification standard? Is the brand transparent about what percentage of its packaging actually contains recycled material?

The most sustainable choice is the one backed by an auditable system, not the most photogenic packaging. Look for the SANBWA logo. It ensures safety, transparency and environmental responsibility. So next time you’re shopping for water, turn the bottle around. If it doesn’t say SANBWA, think twice.

CLICK HERE to submit your press release to MyPR.co.za.

Author: Petra Peacock from Chimeracomms on behalf of SANBWA.

Table of Contents

Toggle
  • Track Your Press Release HERE
  • Share this

Track Your Press Release HERE:

Check Online Visibility

Verify where this release is currently indexed:

Pages: Page 1 Page 2

Read More at MyPR.co.za

PR Service – Content Marketing: This involves creating and distributing valuable, relevant, and consistent content to attract and
retain a clearly defined audience. This can include blog posts, articles, infographics, videos, and social media content.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Category: MyPRTag: Free to Republish, MyPR, News, Press Release

If you feel strongly about this article then feel free to send MyZA a ‘Letter to the Editor’ using the submission form below:


Letter to the Editor

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
If this is in response to an article please include that article title here or as the lead in for the first paragraph of your Letter below.

Separate tags with commas

Localise your letter by naming the city your words are about. Add relevant words describing your subject. Single comma separated words of no more than 5
Your Name(Required)
Your Name will be linked to the website below.
Your personal, business or social media web site
Choose NO to not set up a user account on MyZA. User Accounts will allow you to submit letters under your own Author Name

3 Latest Letters to the Editor:

  • Thoughts on Lotto Winner News

    Dear Editor This is fantastic news for the community of Gqeberha. It is always heartwarming to hear about such life-changing positive outcomes for everyday people. Congratulations to the lucky winner! Regards Buhle Ngcobo In Response to/From: R8.5 Million Lotto Winner Claims Prize in Gqeberha

    13 October 2026
  • Inquiry Regarding SASSA Card Replacement

    Dear Editor I am a social grant recipient and need guidance on swapping my SASSA Gold Card for the Postbank Black Card. Please assist. Regards Buhle Ngcobo In Response to/From: Minister Tolashe assures smooth transition to Postbank Black Cards for grant beneficiaries Swapping your SASSA Gold Card for the new Postbank Black Card is a…

    13 October 2026
  • Congratulations to the Lotto Winner

    Dear Editor Dear Editor, I was thrilled to hear about the R8.5 million Lotto win for the community of Gqeberha. Such life-changing news brings hope and excitement to everyone in the area. I congratulate the winner and wish them all the best with their prize. May this bring positive change to their life and the…

    1 October 2026

About Guest

Previous Post:Eduvos Launches Standalone Faculty of Law and Landmark LLM in Commercial Law: A Bold Step Towards Legal Education Reform
Next Post:The Flea and Tick Survival Guide for Pet Parents

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Dez

    8 September 2026 at 10:12 pm

    \”What kills a skunk is the publicity it gives itself. ~ #Abraham Lincoln

  2. HolyCombo

    5 September 2026 at 10:02 am

    The first PR agency was formed in the early 1900s in Boston. PR has been around since 37000–17000 BC (!), but the first PR agency, The Publicity Bureau, was founded by George Michaelis in the early 1900s and was in operations for 12 years.

  3. ManManMan

    25 August 2026 at 12:44 pm

    “There are three things I always come back to as an organization tries to earn awareness and credibility with its stakeholders: authenticity, transparency, and frequency.” – Steve Cody

Copyright © 2026 · MyZA · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Stratlec Online