• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MyZA

MyZA

News, Directory, Events and Other Stuff

  • Social Media
  • Sport
  • World News
  • Home
  • Submit News
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Stratlec
  • TFSA
  • News
    • APO
    • Today’s Sport News
    • Todays Social Media and Tech Headlines
    • Today’s World News
    • Today’s SA Financial News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / Committee on Health Resolves to Continue With Public Hearing on Tobacco Bill

Committee on Health Resolves to Continue With Public Hearing on Tobacco Bill

25 October 2024 by Guest

Republic of South Africa: The Parliament
Download logo

The Portfolio Committee on Health has resolved, after receiving a legal opinion, to continue with its programme, which among other things includes public hearings on the Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems.

The decision was made after the committee received a legal opinion from Parliament’s Legal Services division. The legal opinion stated that while NEDLAC has an internal protocol for considering matters, the NEDLAC Act does not prescribe a specific process that must be followed. It also noted that NEDLAC is empowered to continue engaging on the bill even after it has been introduced in Parliament.

Committee Chairperson Dr Sibongiseni Dhlomo said, “The legal opinion has provided clarity on the consultation process and we are satisfied that the Department of Health has met the necessary requirements. As a committee, we are now ready to proceed with the remaining public hearings and continue our consideration of the bill.”

The committee had previously conducted public hearings in seven of the nine provinces during the 6th Parliament. The committee will continue with remain two provinces, Northern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal.

Dr Dhlomo said he had written to NEDLAC and had a discussion with the council’s director to ensure open communication and address any outstanding concerns. “We are committed to a transparent and inclusive process, and we welcome further engagement with NEDLAC as we finalise our consideration of this important legislation,” he said.

Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Republic of South Africa: The Parliament.

The Portfolio Committee on Health has resolved, after receiving a legal opinion, to continue with its programme, which among other things includes public hearings on the Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems.

The decision was made after the committee received a legal opinion from Parliament’s Legal Services division. The legal opinion stated that while NEDLAC has an internal protocol for considering matters, the NEDLAC Act does not prescribe a specific process that must be followed. It also noted that NEDLAC is empowered to continue engaging on the bill even after it has been introduced in Parliament.

Committee Chairperson Dr Sibongiseni Dhlomo said, “The legal opinion has provided clarity on the consultation process and we are satisfied that the Department of Health has met the necessary requirements. As a committee, we are now ready to proceed with the remaining public hearings and continue our consideration of the bill.”

The committee had previously conducted public hearings in seven of the nine provinces during the 6th Parliament. The committee will continue with remain two provinces, Northern Cape and KwaZulu-Natal.

Dr Dhlomo said he had written to NEDLAC and had a discussion with the council’s director to ensure open communication and address any outstanding concerns. “We are committed to a transparent and inclusive process, and we welcome further engagement with NEDLAC as we finalise our consideration of this important legislation,” he said.

Per Kind Favour of APO

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Category: NewsTag: ACT, Africa, APO, health, KwaZulu-Natal, Parliament, South Africa, Video

If you feel strongly about this article then feel free to send MyZA a ‘Letter to the Editor’ using the submission form below:


Letter to the Editor

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
If this is in response to an article please include that article title here or as the lead in for the first paragraph of your Letter below.

Separate tags with commas

Localise your letter by naming the city your words are about. Add relevant words describing your subject. Single comma separated words of no more than 5
Your Name(Required)
Your Name will be linked to the website below.
Your personal, business or social media web site
Choose NO to not set up a user account on MyZA. User Accounts will allow you to submit letters under your own Author Name

3 Latest Letters to the Editor:

  • NSFAS 2027 applications close on 31 October — SASSA households, apply now

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. NSFAS applications for the 2027 academic year close on Friday 31 October 2026, and no extension is expected. If your household receives a SASSA grant, your child already passes the NSFAS financial eligibility test — but they still have to…

    25 October 2026
  • Publish the Call, Then Publish the Grade

    Dear Editor, South African football fans argue about everything — lineups, referees, who should start up front. But there’s one argument we never have, because nobody gives us the numbers: were the predictions we read all week actually any good? I help run XG Mind AI, a small independent football data lab. Our rule is…

    25 October 2026
  • Don’t Ignore a SASSA Review Notice — It Is Not a Cancellation

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. SASSA has reminded beneficiaries that a grant review is not a cancellation. A review simply checks whether a beneficiary still meets the qualifying requirements — it can be triggered by a change in income, employment, marital status, address, contact details…

    19 October 2026

About Guest

Previous Post:Police Committee Chairperson Says Increase in Mass Killings Highlights Inadequacies With Crime Intelligence
Next Post:R66-Million Spent on Water Schemes but These Villagers’ Taps Are Still Dry

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. LifeRobber

    21 October 2026 at 5:47 am

    Syria: You have two cows. They have been fighting for as long as you remember, but it is hard to remember anyway, because you are in Sweden.

Copyright © 2026 · MyZA · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Stratlec Online