• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MyZA

MyZA

News, Directory, Events and Other Stuff

  • Social Media
  • Sport
  • World News
  • Home
  • Submit News
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Stratlec
  • TFSA
  • News
    • APO
    • Today’s Sport News
    • Todays Social Media and Tech Headlines
    • Today’s World News
    • Today’s SA Financial News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / “Tegeta 2.0” – Parliament Must Intervene

“Tegeta 2.0” – Parliament Must Intervene

17 May 2026 by Guest

Statement by Kevin Mileham MP – DA Spokesperson on Electricity and Energy:

The Democratic Alliance (DA) calls for an immediate Parliamentary Inquiry into Eskom’s R21 billion diesel procurement saga following revelations that the utility made R3 billion in irregular prepayments to suppliers who lacked the capacity to deliver.

In this regard, the DA will be writing to the Chairperson of the Portfolio Committee on Electricity and Energy to demand an urgent meeting with the Eskom Board to account for these irregularities.

Eskom’s media statement issued yesterday, 15 May 2026, admits to “identified irregularities” and “non-adherence to processes.” However, it carefully avoids the most damning finding: that Eskom bypassed the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA) to provide advance payments to suppliers – a practice that is not only irregular but one that mirrors the corrupt “prepayment” schemes used to fund the Gupta-owned Tegeta coal contracts.

Investigative reports confirm that Eskom approved R3 billion in extraordinary prepayments. These funds were allegedly used to provide liquidity to “middleman” companies that did not have the fuel or the financial standing to fulfil their contracts.

Among the questionable beneficiaries under scrutiny is Severino Industries, which was awarded a R4 billion allocation despite being led by a 24-year-old with no prior energy sector experience, who was appointed just days before the tender closed. Another equally obscure company is Nutinox – a company better known for supplying water tankers to the City of Johannesburg.

Eskom is currently using the “interim” status of its forensic report to hide the full list of beneficiaries. This is an unacceptable attempt to delay accountability until the mid-June final report, while billions in taxpayers’ money remain at risk.

Eskom’s Board and the Minister of Electricity and Energy cannot claim ignorance. The decision to discontinue proactive probity reviews on high-value tenders in October 2022 created the very vacuum that allowed this R21 billion “black hole” to form. While Eskom touts an 81% reduction in diesel spend compared to the R33 billion recorded in FY2023, this “operational success” cannot be used to hand-wave away the massive looting that occurred under their collective watch.

The DA demands that the Minister immediately table all diesel supply and storage contracts related to tender MWP2197GX in Parliament. The Eskom Board must be summoned to the Portfolio Committee on Electricity and Energy next week to explain why prepayments – a “red-flag” practice since the Zondo Commission – were ever authorised. Further, Eskom must initiate immediate legal action to recover all R3 billion in prepayments from suppliers who failed to meet their technical and financial obligations.

We will not allow Eskom to treat the National Treasury as a private ATM for “emergency” shell companies. The era of the “prepayment loophole” must end today.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Category: NewsTag: Letter

If you feel strongly about this article then feel free to send MyZA a ‘Letter to the Editor’ using the submission form below:


Letter to the Editor

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
If this is in response to an article please include that article title here or as the lead in for the first paragraph of your Letter below.

Separate tags with commas

Localise your letter by naming the city your words are about. Add relevant words describing your subject. Single comma separated words of no more than 5
Your Name(Required)
Your Name will be linked to the website below.
Your personal, business or social media web site
Choose NO to not set up a user account on MyZA. User Accounts will allow you to submit letters under your own Author Name

3 Latest Letters to the Editor:

  • Thoughts on Lotto Winner News

    Dear Editor This is fantastic news for the community of Gqeberha. It is always heartwarming to hear about such life-changing positive outcomes for everyday people. Congratulations to the lucky winner! Regards Buhle Ngcobo In Response to/From: R8.5 Million Lotto Winner Claims Prize in Gqeberha

    13 October 2026
  • Inquiry Regarding SASSA Card Replacement

    Dear Editor I am a social grant recipient and need guidance on swapping my SASSA Gold Card for the Postbank Black Card. Please assist. Regards Buhle Ngcobo In Response to/From: Minister Tolashe assures smooth transition to Postbank Black Cards for grant beneficiaries Swapping your SASSA Gold Card for the new Postbank Black Card is a…

    13 October 2026
  • Congratulations to the Lotto Winner

    Dear Editor Dear Editor, I was thrilled to hear about the R8.5 million Lotto win for the community of Gqeberha. Such life-changing news brings hope and excitement to everyone in the area. I congratulate the winner and wish them all the best with their prize. May this bring positive change to their life and the…

    1 October 2026

About Guest

Previous Post:Finishing Touches SA: Helping South Africans Feel at Home Since 2005
Next Post:Ekurhuleni SIU Demand Received by Ramaphosa

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Lilac Lizard

    7 September 2026 at 10:28 am

    Fun South African Fact: For nearly 50 years, there was a state of apartheid – white minority rule – in South Africa.

  2. Grotas

    5 September 2026 at 6:54 pm

    Oom – older man of authority / Uncle [oo-um] Used in reference to an older uncle or even someone who is not your uncle but in an authority position. Usually expressed with respect.

Copyright © 2026 · MyZA · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Stratlec Online