• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MyZA

MyZA

News, Directory, Events and Other Stuff

  • Social Media
  • Sport
  • World News
  • Home
  • Submit News
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Stratlec
  • TFSA
  • News
    • APO
    • Today’s Sport News
    • Todays Social Media and Tech Headlines
    • Today’s World News
    • Today’s SA Financial News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / Beit Bridge Border Fence Scandal

Beit Bridge Border Fence Scandal

6 May 2026 by Guest

The Freedom Front Plus (VF Plus) welcomes the Constitutional Court’s dismissal of applications for leave to appeal by two construction companies seeking to overturn the Special Tribunal’s ruling regarding the Beit Bridge border fence scandal. The Tribunal ruled that all proceeds must be repaid. The Constitutional Court found that the merits of the appeal by […]

The post Beit Bridge border fence scandal: Freedom Front Plus welcomes Constitutional Court ruling appeared first on Freedom Front Plus.

The Freedom Front Plus (VF Plus) welcomes the Constitutional Court’s dismissal of applications for leave to appeal by two construction companies seeking to overturn the Special Tribunal’s ruling regarding the Beit Bridge border fence scandal.

The Tribunal ruled that all proceeds must be repaid.

The Constitutional Court found that the merits of the appeal by Profteam cc and Caledon River Properties, trading as Magma Construction, do not engage its jurisdiction.

In 2020, the Freedom Front Plus welcomed the Special Tribunal’s ruling that contractors were paid millions even before any work on the Beit Bridge border fence had begun.

The end product delivered by these contractors was the notorious “washing line” spanning 40 km between South Africa and Zimbabwe.

The Special Investigating Unit (SIU) took the two companies to court in an effort to recover the R40 million spent on the fence.

The ones who lost the most in this scandal are taxpayers and the state. The Freedom Front Plus confronted the then Minister, Patricia de Lille, about the matter several times in Parliament. The party also pointed out that she apparently had no control over the project, that she had exploited the COVID-19 Disaster Management Act to erect the fence, and that she should accept responsibility for it.

She allowed the project to proceed without ensuring that the relevant procurement procedures were followed.

The Freedom Front Plus still hopes that every effort will be made to recover the funds lost by taxpayers and the state.

Freedom Front Plus Social Welfare: The party supports social welfare programs that benefit vulnerable communities.

Read More at the Source

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Category: NewsTag: ACT, Africa, Freedom Front Plus, Parliament, Politics, South Africa, Zimbabwe

If you feel strongly about this article then feel free to send MyZA a ‘Letter to the Editor’ using the submission form below:


Letter to the Editor

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
If this is in response to an article please include that article title here or as the lead in for the first paragraph of your Letter below.

Separate tags with commas

Localise your letter by naming the city your words are about. Add relevant words describing your subject. Single comma separated words of no more than 5
Your Name(Required)
Your Name will be linked to the website below.
Your personal, business or social media web site
Choose NO to not set up a user account on MyZA. User Accounts will allow you to submit letters under your own Author Name

3 Latest Letters to the Editor:

  • Older Persons Grants Land Today — No Need to Queue at Dawn

    Dear Editor, Older Persons grants are paid today, 30 October, under SASSA’s revised November payment schedule — with disability grants on Monday 2 November, children’s grants on Tuesday 3 November, and grants under review on Thursday 5 November. Two things every beneficiary should know. First, grant money does not expire on payment day. It stays…

    30 October 2026
  • November Grants Pay Early – No Need to Queue at Dawn

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. November grants pay earlier than usual. Older Persons grants are paid on Friday 30 October, Disability grants on 2 November, and Child Support and other grants on 3 November. Grants still under review are paid on 5 November. The money…

    27 October 2026
  • NSFAS 2027 applications close on 31 October — SASSA households, apply now

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. NSFAS applications for the 2027 academic year close on Friday 31 October 2026, and no extension is expected. If your household receives a SASSA grant, your child already passes the NSFAS financial eligibility test — but they still have to…

    25 October 2026

About Guest

Previous Post:Cape Talk Welcomes Music Powerhouse Yonas Aregai – Thursday, 7 May at 9PM
Next Post:President Must Trigger SIU Probe Into Tolashe

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Pixy Mox

    3 September 2026 at 9:55 am

    Gogga – bug [ch-o-cha] The ‘g’ is pronounced as ‘ch’ in the back of the throat (think Scottish “Loch”) and is used to describe a bug or insect.

  2. the howling swede

    30 August 2026 at 10:23 pm

    Voetsek! – Go away! [foot-sak] Usually said with an angry tone when telling someone to go away or get lost. You don’t want to be saying this to a local or worse, if a local says this to you – you’ve really angered them!

Copyright © 2026 · MyZA · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Stratlec Online