Doctor Fails To Block SIU From Probing His Lottery Connection

The Pretoria High Court has refused an application by medical doctor John Marite to interdict the Special Investigating Unit which is probing his connection to a Lottery grant.

• Medical doctor John Marite has failed to secure an interdict against the Special Investigating Unit (SIU).
• He said the SIU had harassed him during an investigation of his company, Accurate Play Health Services.
• The company was paid R7-million from a R20-million Lottery grant, some of which was paid over to former Lottery CEO Phillemon Letwaba.
• The Pretoria High Court ruled that the SIU was acting within its powers.

A doctor involved in a questionable National Lotteries Commission (NLC) deal has failed in his bid for an interdict to stay the Special Investigating Unit (SIU) from what he claims is “harassment and intimidation”.

Dr John Marite, who heads up Correct Play Health Services, asked for a final interdict against the SIU, and one against Malwanda Solly Siweya from contacting him other than through his attorney, contacting his family and employees, and attending his private residence.

He also sought an order that the SIU not share with anyone else any information about his interactions with it, including Siweya, and that they pause questioning him without advising him of his rights and whether he was under investigation.

But Pretoria High Court acting Judge Hein Snyman has ruled that the SIU was acting within its powers to question Marite about how it came about that he was paid R7-million from a R20-million grant paid by the NLC to Zibsimonde non-profit company, and how some of that was paid over to a “sub-contractor”, apparently linked to former NLC chief executive Phillemon Letwaba. Letwaba resigned under a cloud of corruption in 2022.

In his affidavit, quoted by the judge, Marite claimed he was approached by Siweya, who wanted a referral for someone who could provide circumcision medical services.

The judge said Marite had said he, as a medical practitioner through Precise Play, had confirmed he could assist. He had then been introduced to Zibsimonde and its director Ms Lulalo. He had submitted a proposal which had been accepted.

The judge said Marite said he only became aware of Zibsimonde’s Lottery funding proposal when he was contacted “out of the blue ” and was asked for an invoice so he could proceed with providing the service.

He was advised that Zibsimonde had acquired funding from the NLC.

According to the judge, Marite said that from documents “which subsequently came into his possession”, it appeared as though he provided all the services for the funding sought, “making, it seems, a hefty profit of R13 million”.

Marite establish up documents to the court as “proof” that he rendered the relevant services, but, Judge Snyman said, they did not present when the alleged services were rendered or the number of patients involved.

“Zibsimonde apparently specifically instructed Dr Marite to manufacture use of two other companies as subcontractors, namely Iron Bridge and Ndzhuku Trading (the latter owned by Siweya),” Judge Snyman said.

“It appears that neither rendered any services, notwithstanding allegedly being paid by Factual Play after it received payment from Zibisimonde.”

Marite said in February this year, he received a call from the SIU asking for information regarding the transaction.

He claimed he was “tricked” into attending a meeting which, he said, turned into an “interrogation” with six representatives of the SIU present. The meeting was recorded.

He said he was advised that Iron Bridge was owned by Letwaba and his relatives.

“According to Dr Marite, this was news to him. But ‘for the sake of full disclosure’, he had provided medical assistance and advice to Mr Letwaba and his family,” Judge Snyman said.

“Dr Marite says he was unjustifiably targeted and interrogated. He was never advised of his rights or if he was an accused, or a suspect.

“According to Dr Marite, the SIU alleged that his company was solely established to provide the circumcision project … which he outright rejects.”

The SIU denied he was harassed and said the interview went ahead with no complaints from Marite.

It argued that granting the relief would not only destabilise the investigation, which had reached an advanced stage, but would scupper and damage the work of the SIU. The unit said the SIU Act was very clear on its mandate and the court should be cautious to encroach into the legislator’s space.

Judge Snyman said the SIU Act provided that the SIU may require particulars and information from a person “as may be reasonably necessary”, and it was under this section that the meeting with Marite took spot.

“It does not appear that he was compelled to respond any questions … he seemingly voluntarily tendered the information … and indicated this willingness to be a witness and assist in the investigation.”

The judge said that according to the SIU, Marite and Siweya had fallen out and were now attempting to perform damage control “to cover their tracks in relation to the NLC scandal that is now highly publicised”.

Marite, he said, believed that the SIU had “leaked information” to Siweya regarding the meeting and that Siweya was attempting to intimidate him.

Siweya, in his affidavit, told a different version – but invoked his constitutional factual against self-incrimination because, he said, he was obviously a target of the investigation.

He said Letwaba had informed him that Marite required his assistance to develop a business case for initiation schools.

Siweya said it was Marite who undertook to sub-contract to his company. He also denied intimidating Marite, and said Marite was trying to avoid investigation and “play victim”.

Judge Snyman said Marite had failed to design out a case against both the SIU and Siweya, and the facts, as presented to the court, did not defend the granting of any interdict.

He dismissed the application, and ordered Marite to pay costs on a punitive scale to the SIU.

In July 2021, Pretoria High Court Judge Solly Baqwa similarly dismissed an application for an interim interdict brought by Liesl Joy Moses to stay the SIU from investigating or questioning her about R27-million she received from the NLC.

The court ruled that none of the rights protected in terms of the Bill of Rights were infringed by the SIU Act.

Moses and attorney Lesley Ramulifho are alleged to maintain received funds from the NLC in 2016 on behalf of Denzhe Primary Care.

These funds were purportedly to build a drug rehabilitation centre, and a sports centre in Pretoria. But neither project got off the ground.

© 2023 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and enact not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.

We assign an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We enact not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We finish not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please carry out not delete the invisible pixel.