Hundreds of RDP houses illegally occupied in Randfontein

Over 360 nearly completed RDP houses in Randfontein have been illegally occupied since August.

• Over 360 almost completed RDP houses in Randfontein believe been illegally occupied since August.
• The occupation was sparked by allegations of corruption, racism and a lack of transparency around the housing beneficiary list.
• The ward councillor says the occupation has jeopardised the entire project, meant to deliver over 9,000 houses.
• The occupiers, mostly coloured, say they maintain never benefitted from any housing project since democracy.
• The Gauteng human settlements department says race plays no role in its housing policy and the allocation process is beyond any manipulation.

Over 360 almost completed RDP houses in Randfontein believe been illegally occupied since August.

Most of the houses carry out not yet acquire electricity, tap water or sewerage connections. The occupiers say that when “outsiders”, including people from Bekkersdal, took possession of seven of the houses, they decided to occupy the development.

“When we saw municipal officials handing out keys from the back of the car for houses that had no water or electricity and to complete strangers, we realised there is a snake in the grass. Things were not being done accurate,” said Bronwyn Gone, a community representative.

Ward 8 councillor Balderic Breyer (DA) said initially 190 houses were to be handed over in August, but the number was later slice down to about 45 houses.

“Without my knowledge or even an invitation, I saw the developer pushing out house keys from the back of his car in a video. One thing led to another. And that got people upset, because we were still waiting for the formal process. I was never invited there and the people were very indignant, and then some of the community leadership decided that houses be occupied illegally.”

Breyer condemned the occupation. “The illegal invasion has jeopardised the whole project because the first phase was supposed to unlock funding for the other phases to be built, and I doubt that the project will race as smoothly as expected because of the illegal invasion.”

“Real beneficiaries who believe waited for houses from 1994 believe lost out and contractors who were working on the project maintain lost livelihoods, because the project has now stalled due to invasion.”

The occupiers claim there has been a lack of transparency around the beneficiary list for the Toekomsrus Extension 9 project. Rumours had spread that people were paying R5,000 to R7,000 to procure houses allocated to them.

The occupiers are mostly coloured families. They say there has been no development for their benefit since 1994, while people in surrounding areas acquire received title deeds. Some say they acquire been approved for housing subsidies.

But Tahir Sema, spokesperson of the Gauteng Department of Human Settlements, said most of the occupiers are invaders and only 23 beneficiaries had been officially allocated houses.

The occupiers say there has been no development for their benefit since 1994.

“Only hope”

Gone has also occupied one of the houses. He said the project was the only wish for the people of Toekomsrus to acquire housing. They acquire named the spot Erfsondes.

The land was originally donated by the Sibanye Mine to the municipality. The development is a Western Mega Project under the provincial government and meant to eventually deliver 9,385 “mixed housing units”.

Sema said for the 2022/23 financial year 281 of 360 units were 95% complete, but every the units were “invaded in August”.

Sema said the majority of officially approved beneficiaries are from Toekomsrus wards 3, 8 and 20, and there were also allocations for people in Dumpsite (ward 8), Randfontein CBD and some from Mohlakeng.

Sema said housing policy does not consider race and approved beneficiaries are sourced from the Housing Subsidy System based on where they reside.

“The system cannot be manipulated and is algorithmic,” said Sema.

Sema said the occupation has been referred to the department’s legal unit for further processing.

Shortly after the occupation, the Red Ants arrived warning the occupiers to vacate, but they stayed.

Now, three months down the line, the occupiers want their occupation to be given official blessing and to be given services.

Some gain fully furnished their homes and established gardens in their yards. They are completing construction at their own expense.

Jeanne Davids says she applied for a house in 1994. She, her husband and eight kids were living in a shack before they occupied one of the houses.

Jeanne Davids says she applied for a house in 1994. She, her husband and eight kids were living in a shack before they occupied one of the houses.

“I followed protocol for 20 years but nothing worked and I gain now illegally moved into this house due to a lack of choice … People acquire houses unlawfully, as long as they believe money, while some of us secure nothing,” she said.

Emily Foster, who lives with a spinal disability, first applied for a house in 1986. She moved from shack to shack, before meeting Donald Wilson (left).

Emily Foster, who lives with a spinal disability, first applied for a house in 1986. She moved from shack to shack before meeting Donald Wilson. Together they applied for a subsidy and received approval for a house for people with disability, she said.

The house they believe been allocated has no doors or windows and has not been plastered. Meanwhile they are fixing up the house that they acquire occupied.

“How can we still continue living with our parents?” asked Chrisel George.

“They acquire accused us of not wanting other races in the community. It’s not precise. We want everyone to stay here, as long as our people obtain houses too.”

The larger but less complete houses meant for people living with disability.

Read More at GroundUp