GOOD Statement by Brett Herron, Unite for Change Leadership Council Member & GOOD Secretary-General:
Judge Sisi Khampepe is arguably the best-qualified person in the country to get to the bottom of alleged political interference to block the prosecution of apartheid-era perpetrators of gross human rights violations.
She is the only person in South Africa whose CV includes the experience of having served the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, National Prosecutions Authority and Constitutional Court.
The Gauteng High Court today dismissed the application by former Presidents Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma for Judge Khampepe recusal from chairing the commission appointed by President Cyril Ramaphosa to investigate why the TRC’s recommendations on prosecutions and re-opening apartheid-era inquests were not implemented.
Why are the two former Presidents behaving as if they are on trial?
The TRC was South Africa’s designated vehicle to confront and process apartheid-era criminality. It offered amnesty to qualifying perpetrators and recommended the prosecution of those to whom amnesty was not granted.
From evidence led at the commission to date, there appears to have been an attempt during Mbeki’s presidency to implement a second amnesty process. What Zuma did or didn’t do related to these matters is not so well known.
If implementing a second amnesty process was a noble pursuit, instead of joining his successor in trying to bully the judge with technical lawfare Mbeki should take the nation into his confidence and explain his thinking.
It would be fascinating to understand why, for example, reopening the inquest into the murder of another former ANC President, Chief Albert Luthuli, was delayed for decades by an ANC-led government.
If Mbeki and Zuma’s believe that by removing Judge Khampepe they will somehow manage to control the narrative, and keep a lid on whatever it is that they don’t want South Africans to know, they are too late.
A vast amount of information has already been publicly conveyed, under oath, to Judge Khampepe. Even if the former Presidents do find a sympathetic court and manage to muzzle the judge, more evidence of interference will be led in the damages case victims’ families have brought against the government for allegedly interfering in the wheels of justice.
The former Presidents are likely to take the Gauteng court’s decision to the Appeal Court.
In the meantime, Judge Khampepe must act with renewed vigour to complete her assignment.
Why is this important? Because South Africa lives every day with the consequences of police and prosecutors not performing their duties with impartiality and integrity.
GOOD Manifesto on Tourism Development: Aiming to boost the tourism sector as a key economic driver.
Darkside Isis
Jamaica: You have two cows. They win 25 gold medals at the Bovine Olympics.
Sofa King
The only thing that a man who hangs around a beautiful lady without saying a word can do is to fetch water during her wedding day