• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MyZA

MyZA

News, Directory, Events and Other Stuff

  • Social Media
  • Sport
  • World News
  • Home
  • Submit News
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Stratlec
  • TFSA
  • News
    • APO
    • Today’s Sport News
    • Todays Social Media and Tech Headlines
    • Today’s World News
    • Today’s SA Financial News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / Tshwane’s Contempt for Public Objections

Tshwane’s Contempt for Public Objections

26 September 2025 by Guest

During a recent council meeting, the Freedom Front Plus (VF Plus) in the Tshwane Metro voted against a proposal by the ANC/EFF/ActionSA Mayoral Committee regarding a report on the approval of the Regional Spatial Development Framework (RSDF) for 2025. The Freedom Front Plus pointed out that serious statutory shortcomings pose a risk of violating national […]

The post Tshwane’s contempt for public objections could lead to violation of legislation appeared first on Freedom Front Plus.

During a recent council meeting, the Freedom Front Plus (VF Plus) in the Tshwane Metro voted against a proposal by the ANC/EFF/ActionSA Mayoral Committee regarding a report on the approval of the Regional Spatial Development Framework (RSDF) for 2025.

The Freedom Front Plus pointed out that serious statutory shortcomings pose a risk of violating national legislation.

Eighteen valid public objections were ignored, potentially leading to the violation of the following legislation:

  • The National Environmental Management Act, due to the absence of confirmed environmental impact studies for developments in sensitive ecological areas.
  • The Spatial Planning and Land Use Management Act, due to the rejection of public submissions on spatial justice and sustainability.
  • The Municipal Systems Act, due to the lack of infrastructure verification and implementation timelines for high-density development.
  • The National Heritage Resources Act, due to the exclusion of heritage-related submissions from areas where they are required.

The Freedom Front Plus cannot endorse a Framework that permits illegal development, ignores infrastructure constraints and erases cultural heritage as a result of procedural failures.

The Regional Spatial Development Framework should not only be strategic, but also lawful, inclusive and feasible.

The party recommended that the implementation of the Regional Spatial Development Framework should be halted until full compliance with all applicable national legislation is confirmed.

To ensure this, the Freedom Front Plus proposes the following:

  • All disregarded public submissions should be formally referred to the relevant departments for review and reporting.
  • Implementation of the Framework should be subject to environmental impact studies, infrastructure verification and heritage assessments.
  • Approval of designated development areas may only be provisional, pending statutory clearance.
  • An appendix detailing the Framework’s implementation has to be submitted to the Council within 60 days, including clear timelines, monitoring mechanisms and community inputs.

It is once again evident that the ANC, EFF and ActionSA coalition is disregarding legislation while perpetuating lawless governance at the expense of public participation, legal compliance and infrastructure capacity.

Freedom Front Plus Formation: The FF Plus was formed in 1994 as the Freedom Front.

Read More at the Source

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Category: NewsTag: ACT, community, Compliance, EFF, environmental impact, Freedom Front Plus, Impact, infrastructure, Politics, Pretoria, Sustainability, Tshwane

If you feel strongly about this article then feel free to send MyZA a ‘Letter to the Editor’ using the submission form below:


Letter to the Editor

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
If this is in response to an article please include that article title here or as the lead in for the first paragraph of your Letter below.

Separate tags with commas

Localise your letter by naming the city your words are about. Add relevant words describing your subject. Single comma separated words of no more than 5
Your Name(Required)
Your Name will be linked to the website below.
Your personal, business or social media web site
Choose NO to not set up a user account on MyZA. User Accounts will allow you to submit letters under your own Author Name

3 Latest Letters to the Editor:

  • Re: R8.5 Million Lotto Winner Claims Prize in Gqeberha

    Dear Editor This is indeed an exciting story for the community. Congratulations to the winner and may this bring positive change to Nomathamsanqa. As someone from KwaMashu, I understand the impact such winnings can have on township communities. Wishing the grandfather all the best. Regards Themba Zulu In Response to/From: R8.5 Million Lotto Winner Claims…

    18 September 2026
  • Re: Minister Tolashe and Postbank Black Cards

    Dear Editor I appreciate the Minister’s assurance regarding the smooth transition to Postbank Black Cards for grant beneficiaries. As a concerned citizen, I hope the government will ensure that all beneficiaries, especially elderly and vulnerable populations in areas like Soweto, receive adequate assistance during this transition period. The expansion of card replacement locations to include…

    18 September 2026
  • Lotto Winner Story

    Dear Editor This is indeed an exciting story for the community. Congratulations to the winner and may this bring positive change to Nomathamsanqa. Regards Willem Pieterse In Response to/From: R8.5 Million Lotto Winner Claims Prize in Gqeberha

    16 September 2026

About Guest

Previous Post:Nche Withdraws Due to Niggle
Next Post:African Leaders Call for Bold, United Action to Tackle Global Health Crises and Sustain Malaria Progress

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Scare Stone

    17 September 2026 at 10:11 pm

    India: You have two cows. You create a new country to banish all your people who might eat them.

  2. Liquid Death

    26 August 2026 at 2:14 am

    Why was Dr. Jekyll banned from South Africa? Because he was a part Hyde

Copyright © 2026 · MyZA · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Stratlec Online