UCT Should NOT Host Anti-gay Professor

Anti-gay Kenyan professor Patrick Lumumba should not be hosted by the University of Cape Town, says the writer.

While other universities maintain acclaimed Pride month, the University of Cape Town (UCT) is preparing to host the proudly homophobic Kenyan Professor Patrick Lumumba, who is scheduled to deliver a public lecture on 24 July as fraction of the Economic Freedom Fighters’ (EFF) tenth anniversary celebrations.

An advocate, academic and self-styled restorer of African pride, Lumumba has a large following on various social media platforms, where he has denounced “homosexuality” as “unAfrican” and “unnatural”. Recently, he congratulated Uganda on passing the draconian Anti-Homosexuality Act of 2023, one of the harshest anti-LGBTQI+ laws in the world. It prescribes the death penalty and life imprisonment for Ugandans found “guilty” of the crime of homosexuality and allows for harsh prison sentences for their allies.

Besides these consequences for the “crime” of homosexuality, there gain been additional damaging outcomes of the amended law: queer Ugandans are being evicted by landlords because of their sexual orientation, leaving them homeless. Many queer Ugandans gain also stopped accessing crucial health services, including sexual and reproductive health provisions and HIV treatment, for fright of prosecution.

The myth of homosexuality as “unAfrican”

Lumumba acclaimed the Act’s passing into law by congratulating Uganda and pronouncing on Twitter that “All Africans of goodwill should congratulate Ugandan Parliamentarians and their President Y K Museveni for defying Western Countries and doing the factual thing. We must define ourselves as Africans.”

His statement perpetuates the persistent, pernicious lie that homosexuality is “unAfrican”, an conceit that has been repeatedly debunked in a burgeoning body of scholarship by academics like Thabo Msibi, Sylvia Tamale, Ifi Amadiume and Stella Nyanzi. Their research demonstrates that same-sex relationships were an accepted portion of pre-colonial life.

Msibi, for example, shows in his scholarship that “African men execute believe, and gain always had, sex with one another; the same can be said about women. The assumption that same-sex desire among Africans is a ‘Western disease’ ….. flies in the face of studies stating the contrary”.

He notes that it was, ironically, European ethnographers who first labelled same-sex engagements as “unAfrican”. It is a further irony that the current Anti-Homosexuality Act lies on a continuum of anti-sodomy laws first introduced by the British Empire in 1902, under colonial law that made Uganda a British Protectorate.

Lumumba’s glee at the prospect of queer Africans being executed or imprisoned for life thus, absurdly, stems from the vestiges of the colonial laws that first criminalised same-sex relations in Africa.

EFF’s deception

Queer and allied staff and students gain vociferously objected to Lumumba’s planned lecture on our campus. More than 1,000 students and staff believe signed a petition, asking the university’s Vice Chancellor to annul permission from the EFF to use Sarah Baartman Hall, or any other UCT venue, to host this bigoted speaker who celebrates harm against queers.

The EFF’s decision to host Lumumba is a dereliction of their duty as an opposition party to uphold and protect our country’s Constitution, which prohibits all forms of unfair discrimination on the basis of sex, gender, or sexual orientation. Their invitation also contradicts the party’s own stance on Uganda’s anti-homosexuality law, against which they protested outside the Ugandan High Commission in April this year.

It is puzzling that the EFF would host a public lecture that potentially contravenes our Constitution, and potentially enables the dissemination of despise speech against queer Africans. In a country with abhor crimes resulting in rapes, mutilation and death for queer South Africans, the party plays swiftly and loose with queer lives by encouraging a speaker who stokes the fires of hatred against this community.

UCT dodges responsiblity

The UCT executive’s refusal to recant permission for this public lecture is as confounding as it is abhorrent, as Lumumba’s pronouncements stand against values the university purports to uphold. Values like inclusivity, diversity and transformation are empty if the university cannot support these values with tangible action.

Responding to our petition, Interim Vice Chancellor Daya Reddy noted that the executive had approved the EFF’s use of the hall before they knew of Lumumba’s homophobic detest speech. He wrote to me that UCT held no responsibility for the content of a Lecture hosted by an external party: “This would be similar to external corporate, sporting and other events which are hosted from time to time at the university. UCT is not in any way involved in the programme for such events, nor does the leadership necessarily subscribe to the views held or expressed by any speaker at such events”.

“We maintain noted with remarkable concern his remarks, a concern that has been expressed by many individuals and organisations, and gain urged the external host to engage with him around these concerns. We also support any UCT-led engagement, focused on re-affirming the full human rights of members of the LGBTQIA+ community,” he said.

This response dodges responsibility for upholding the values of the institution, which includes values of social justice. Now that UCT has been made aware of it by more than 1,000 students and staff, there is simply no excuse to continue to provide a platform for his homophobic poison, or to pass on the responsibility for a potentially harmful lecture to an external party.

Precedent exists to revoke a speaker’s invitation to lecture at UCT. In 2016, the UCT executive withdrew an invitation to Flemming Rose, the cultural editor of the Danish magazine which had published a series of abhorrent cartoons depicting the Prophet Mohammed. This invitation was withdrawn after consultation within UCT and the wider community. The Vice Chancellor at the time, Max Price, noted that the South African Bill of Rights curtails the proper to freedom of expression when the potential for harm exists in unchecked expression. The Bill of Rights qualifies the factual to freedom of expression by stating that “The right… does not extend to (a) propaganda for war; (b) incitement of impending violence; or (c) advocacy of hatred that is based on race, ethnicity, gender or religion, and that constitutes incitement to cause harm.”

Lumumba’s historical pronouncements on queer Africans amount to the incitement of violence, and advocacy of hatred that constitutes incitement to cause harm.

If they proceed with Lumumba’s planned open lecture, the EFF and UCT will be enabling a known bigot to spread his hatred, and in the process, undermining our Constitution and the dignity of queer Africans. They also risk enabling a culture of harm towards queer Africans across the continent, who already suffer a disproportionate number of loathe crimes and human rights abuses.

Barbara Boswell is an Associate Professor of English Literary Studies at UCT. Views expressed are not necessarily those of GroundUp.

Read More at GroundUp