• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MyZA

MyZA

News, Directory, Events and Other Stuff

  • Social Media
  • Sport
  • World News
  • Home
  • Submit News
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Stratlec
  • TFSA
  • News
    • APO
    • Today’s Sport News
    • Todays Social Media and Tech Headlines
    • Today’s World News
    • Today’s SA Financial News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / Victim of wrongful arrest gets R2.6-million from Minister of Police

Victim of wrongful arrest gets R2.6-million from Minister of Police

19 September 2023 by Guest

Ntokozo Patrick Xulu spent 813 days behind bars

 

A man who spent 813 days in prison as a result of a wrongful arrest has successfully claimed damages from the police.

  • The victim of an attempted hijacking who shot and killed one of his attackers spent 813 days behind bars as a result of a wrongful arrest.
  • Judge Irene de Vos found that the police had suppressed evidence from the prosecution and had “failed in their public duty”.
  • Ntokozo Patrick Xulu was acquitted of murder at his trial but had “lost two years of his life”, the judge said.
  • The Johannesburg High Court has ordered the Minister of Police to pay R2.6-million in damages.

A victim of an attempted hijacking, who shot and killed one of his attackers, spent more than two years behind bars because the police suppressed evidence from the prosecution that he had acted in self-defence, the Johannesburg High Court has ruled.

Acting Judge Irene de Vos has ordered the Minister of Police to pay Ntokozo Patrick Xulu R2.6-million for wrongful arrest and detention.

Xulu was detained for 813 days after an attempted robbery outside his home during which he shot and killed one of the hijackers, described in the judgment as “Mr Rodriguez”.

Read the judgment here

Xulu was arrested while on his way to a local police station to report the incident. He was pulled over by the police. He admitted that he had shot someone and he showed the officer his registered firearm. But in spite of his protestations that he had acted in self-defence, he was arrested and spent two nights in police custody before appearing in court.

He was denied bail.

Xulu said that even though most of the time he spent in jail awaiting trial was at the behest of the prosecutor, his claim was against the police, because the investigating officer had deliberately withheld his defence.

Judge de Vos said Xulu had told the police repeatedly that he had acted in self-defence. But the prosecution was unaware the person being charged had been a victim of an attack and had acted to protect his own life.

“His persistent refrain during his testimony was that ‘I told them, but no one would listen to me. I was the victim of crime, but they treated me like a criminal”.

He also told his version to “anyone who would listen” while he was in prison.

Judge de Vos said while Xulu’s initial explanation to the police might acquire seemed fanciful, the scales soon tipped in his favour.

She said he had honest arrived home from work. The area he lived in was uncertain. He had first fired warning shots, but Rodriguez was undeterred. He then fired in the direction of Rodriguez. He then drove in the direction of Hillbrow police station to report the incident.

“Had he sought to flee the scene he did a terrible job of it. He should maintain gone in an entirely different direction,” Judge de Vos said.

“His version was accepted during his murder trial. His explanation of the attack and the warning shots he fired were confirmed by objective evidence in the form of cartridge cases found on the scene and ballistic reports.

“His acquittal came after he spent two years in Johannesburg prison waiting for his day in court.”

The police officers denied that Xulu had claimed he acted in self defence. But evidence, in the form of a cover letter sent to ballistics for testing of the cartridges a week after he was arrested, proved otherwise. In it the Commander of Crime Investigation Services in Hillbrow noted the date and time of the offence, stating a hijacker was shot “in the act”.

Judge de Vos said it was also improbable that Xulu would not acquire told the police.

“The police’s version is so improbable that it borders on implausible,” she said.

The Judge said the investigating officer had been asked why he had not informed the prosecutor of Xulu’s defence.

“His astonishing reply was that even if he had been told (of the defence), it was not his job to elaborate it to the prosecutor.

“This is at odds with our law. He failed in his public duty.”

The prosecutor, who testified in Xulu’s damages claim, had said if she had been informed of the defence she would gain approached the matter differently.

Further, the conduct of the police had prevented the magistrate from applying his mind to the issue of bail.

Dealing with quantum, the judge said there was not one “glimmer of recognition of the impact on Mr Xulu’s life”.

“The police not only suppressed his evidence, they conducted a wholly inadequate and shoddy investigation and delayed the investigation for months on halt with no reasonable explanation.

“This was the first time Mr Xulu had been arrested in his entire life. His detention shocked and traumatised him. He explained the inadequacy of the food he received, the assaults he suffered at the hands of other inmates, and the terror he lived in whilst detained.

“His youngest daughter, who relied on him for medical aid, was denied medical care, which broke his spirit.

“He lived in constant terror of gangs. He escaped a violent fight by hiding under his bed. He still bears the scar on his face as a result of this fight. It appears he suffered a mental breakdown. He explained that he was hungry, fearful and cold. He lost more than two years of his life.”

The judge ordered the minister to pay Xulu R2.6-million for wrongful arrest and detention.

She ordered the minister to pay the costs of the application on a punitive scale.

© 2023 GroundUp. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

You may republish this article, so long as you credit the authors and GroundUp, and finish not change the text. Please include a link back to the original article.

We assign an invisible pixel in the article so that we can count traffic to republishers. All analytics tools are solely on our servers. We finish not give our logs to any third party. Logs are deleted after two weeks. We execute not use any IP address identifying information except to count regional traffic. We are solely interested in counting hits, not tracking users. If you republish, please carry out not delete the invisible pixel.

Read More at GroundUp

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Category: NewsTag: GroundUp, Johannesburg, law, Letter, Man, ONE

If you feel strongly about this article then feel free to send MyZA a ‘Letter to the Editor’ using the submission form below:


Letter to the Editor

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
If this is in response to an article please include that article title here or as the lead in for the first paragraph of your Letter below.

Separate tags with commas

Localise your letter by naming the city your words are about. Add relevant words describing your subject. Single comma separated words of no more than 5
Your Name(Required)
Your Name will be linked to the website below.
Your personal, business or social media web site
Choose NO to not set up a user account on MyZA. User Accounts will allow you to submit letters under your own Author Name

3 Latest Letters to the Editor:

  • Older Persons Grants Land Today — No Need to Queue at Dawn

    Dear Editor, Older Persons grants are paid today, 30 October, under SASSA’s revised November payment schedule — with disability grants on Monday 2 November, children’s grants on Tuesday 3 November, and grants under review on Thursday 5 November. Two things every beneficiary should know. First, grant money does not expire on payment day. It stays…

    30 October 2026
  • November Grants Pay Early – No Need to Queue at Dawn

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. November grants pay earlier than usual. Older Persons grants are paid on Friday 30 October, Disability grants on 2 November, and Child Support and other grants on 3 November. Grants still under review are paid on 5 November. The money…

    27 October 2026
  • NSFAS 2027 applications close on 31 October — SASSA households, apply now

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. NSFAS applications for the 2027 academic year close on Friday 31 October 2026, and no extension is expected. If your household receives a SASSA grant, your child already passes the NSFAS financial eligibility test — but they still have to…

    25 October 2026

About Guest

Previous Post:Three people die in shack fire in Joe Slovo Park
Next Post:Unlocking Cash Flow: 5 Strategies for SMEs to Fuel Growth

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Freeway

    27 September 2026 at 8:11 pm

    A child can play with anything including his mother’s breast but not his father’s testicles.

  2. Instant Star

    24 September 2026 at 4:06 pm

    Papua New Guinea: You have two cows. One eats the other.

Copyright © 2026 · MyZA · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Stratlec Online