• Skip to main content
  • Skip to header right navigation
  • Skip to after header navigation
  • Skip to site footer
MyZA

MyZA

News, Directory, Events and Other Stuff

  • Social Media
  • Sport
  • World News
  • Home
  • Submit News
  • Directory
  • Events
  • Stratlec
  • TFSA
  • News
    • APO
    • Today’s Sport News
    • Todays Social Media and Tech Headlines
    • Today’s World News
    • Today’s SA Financial News
  • Contact
You are here: Home / News / WC Land Use Management Amendment: Participation Is Not a Luxury

WC Land Use Management Amendment: Participation Is Not a Luxury

11 June 2026 by Guest

Speech by Brett Herron, GOOD Secretary-General & City of Cape Town Mayoral Candidate. *Note to Editor: This speech was delivered during the Provincial Parliament sitting on the proposed amendments to the Western Cape Land Use Planning Act (LUPA).

The post WC LAND USE MANAGEMENT AMENDMENT: PARTICIPATION IS NOT A LUXURY appeared first on For Good.

GOOD Speech delivered during the Provincial Parliament sitting on the proposed amendments to the Western Cape Land Use Planning Act (LUPA) by Brett Herron, GOOD Secretary-General & Member of Provincial Parliament:

These amendments to the Western Cape Land Use Planning Act deserve scrutiny, because they simultaneously strip minimum public participation requirements and weaken the spatial planning safeguards this province depends on.

Land-use decisions are not merely technical exercises.

They shape people’s daily lives.

Where people live.

How far they travel to work.

Whether children have access to schools.

Whether communities are integrated or further fragmented.

These amendments cut at both participation and planning integrity at once.

On participation:

Clauses 14, 15 and 16 repeal the mandatory minimum notice and consultation requirements of Sections 43 and 44, and halve comment periods from 60 to 30 days.

In a country still defined by deep spatial inequality, minimum participation standards are not procedural luxuries, they are constitutional necessities.

Stripping them does not produce efficiency. It produces exclusion.

On spatial frameworks:

Clause 6 rewrites the consistency standard.

Developments will now need only to avoid conflicting with a spatial development framework’s main goals, rather than positively aligning with its specific designations.

Bodies like the Cape Town Municipal Planning Tribunal will have even less reason to enforce these frameworks rigorously.

Over time, this hollows out the very tools designed to undo the spatial legacy of apartheid.

What is the point of carefully crafted spatial plans if they can be routinely sidestepped?

What does it mean for spatial justice when speed and convenience begin to outweigh inclusion and coherence?

Efficiency matters.

But once minimum participation standards are stripped away and planning frameworks are diluted, the costs are not procedural, they are structural, enduring, and borne by the most vulnerable.

These amendments, in their current form, cannot be supported.

GOOD Electoral Performance: GOOD contested its first national elections in 2019.

Read More at the Source

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Print (Opens in new window) Print
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Tumblr (Opens in new window) Tumblr
  • Share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window) WhatsApp
  • Share on Mastodon (Opens in new window) Mastodon
Category: NewsTag: ACT, CAN, Cape Town, children, Editor, GOOD, Parliament, Political Party, Western Cape

If you feel strongly about this article then feel free to send MyZA a ‘Letter to the Editor’ using the submission form below:


Letter to the Editor

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
If this is in response to an article please include that article title here or as the lead in for the first paragraph of your Letter below.

Separate tags with commas

Localise your letter by naming the city your words are about. Add relevant words describing your subject. Single comma separated words of no more than 5
Your Name(Required)
Your Name will be linked to the website below.
Your personal, business or social media web site
Choose NO to not set up a user account on MyZA. User Accounts will allow you to submit letters under your own Author Name

3 Latest Letters to the Editor:

  • Older Persons Grants Land Today — No Need to Queue at Dawn

    Dear Editor, Older Persons grants are paid today, 30 October, under SASSA’s revised November payment schedule — with disability grants on Monday 2 November, children’s grants on Tuesday 3 November, and grants under review on Thursday 5 November. Two things every beneficiary should know. First, grant money does not expire on payment day. It stays…

    30 October 2026
  • November Grants Pay Early – No Need to Queue at Dawn

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. November grants pay earlier than usual. Older Persons grants are paid on Friday 30 October, Disability grants on 2 November, and Child Support and other grants on 3 November. Grants still under review are paid on 5 November. The money…

    27 October 2026
  • NSFAS 2027 applications close on 31 October — SASSA households, apply now

    Dear Editor, I run SAGrant (sagrant.co.za), a free resource helping South Africans navigate SASSA grants. NSFAS applications for the 2027 academic year close on Friday 31 October 2026, and no extension is expected. If your household receives a SASSA grant, your child already passes the NSFAS financial eligibility test — but they still have to…

    25 October 2026

About Guest

Previous Post:Breaking Down Borders TV Series Wins International Telly Award
Next Post:Ethiopia Plans Bigger Budget for Next Fiscal Year as Iran War Raises Costs

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Emerald Goddess

    3 September 2026 at 8:45 am

    Van, startled, spins around and answers the rep, \”It\’s my donkey\’s ears. When they walk under the highway their ears rub along the roof and hurt them. I\’m making it taller so that doesn\’t happen\”.

    The rep looking confused, because it\’s a dirt track that runs under the bridge, asks him, \”Why don\’t you grade or dig some of the soil to lower the surface so they can pass through without their ears touching?\”

    Van – no the one looking confused then angry answers, \”No man, it\’s their ears that are too long, not their legs!\”

  2. Bazooka Har-De-Har

    1 September 2026 at 5:59 pm

    Anyone who goes to bed with an itching anus should brace up for smelly fingers in the morning

Copyright © 2026 · MyZA · All Rights Reserved · Powered by Stratlec Online